Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138749›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Optimizing Acute Stroke Segmentation on MRI Using Deep Learning: Self-Configuring Neural Networks Provide High Performance Using Only DWI Sequences.

Peter Kamel, Adway Kanhere, Pranav Kulkarni, Mazhar Khalid, Rachel Steger, Uttam Bodanapally, Dheeraj Gandhi, Vishwa Parekh, Paul H Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter KamelDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. pkamel@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-9801
Adway KanhereDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pranav KulkarniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mazhar KhalidDepartment of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rachel StegerUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Uttam BodanapallyDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dheeraj GandhiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vishwa ParekhDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paul H YiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. pyi@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of infarcts is clinically important in ischemic stroke management and prognostication. It is unclear what role the combination of DWI, ADC, and FLAIR MRI sequences provide for deep learning in infarct segmentation. Recent technologies in model self-configuration have promised greater performance and generalizability through automated optimization. We assessed the utility of DWI, ADC, and FLAIR sequences on ischemic stroke segmentation, compared self-configuring nnU-Net models to conventional U-Net models without manual optimization, and evaluated the generalizability of results on an external clinical dataset. 3D self-configuring nnU-Net models and standard 3D U-Net models with MONAI were trained on 200 infarcts using DWI, ADC, and FLAIR sequences separately and in all combinations. Segmentation results were compared between models using paired t-test comparison on a hold-out test set of 50 cases. The highest performing model was externally validated on a clinical dataset of 50 MRIs. nnU-Net with DWI sequences attained a Dice score of 0.810 ± 0.155. There was no statistically significant difference when DWI sequences were supplemented with ADC and FLAIR images (Dice score of 0.813 ± 0.150; p = 0.15). nnU-Net models significantly outperformed standard U-Net models for all sequence combinations (p < 0.001). On the external dataset, Dice scores measured 0.704 ± 0.199 for positive cases with false positives with intracranial hemorrhage. Highly optimized neural networks such as nnU-Net provide excellent stroke segmentation even when only provided DWI images, without significant improvement from other sequences. This differs from-and significantly outperforms-standard U-Net architectures. Results translated well to the external clinical environment and provide the groundwork for optimized acute stroke segmentation on MRI.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDeep learningInfarctMRInnU-NetSegmentationStroke

Identifiers

PMID39138749
PMCPMC11950494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.