SynthesisNeurocritical care2025
Efficacy of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonists in Treating Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Brain Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Animal Studies.
Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AMPA Receptor Antagonists in Preclinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Animal Studies.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- A prospective observational within-person MRI morphometric study comparing ictal and interictal brain volumes in status migrainosus.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Magnesium in Neurocritical Care: Clinical Relevance, Status Assessment, and Practical Implications for Outcomes-A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Amantadine Attenuates Secondary Oxidative and Inflammatory Injury by Modulating the HIF-1α/BNIP3L/HMGB1 Axis in Rat Model of Traumatic Brain Injury.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury leads to glutamate release, which overstimulates N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, leading to neurotoxicity and cytotoxic edema. NMDA receptor antagonists may offer neuroprotection by blocking this pathway. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonists for traumatic brain injury-induced brain edema in rodent models. This systematic review followed Cochrane Handbook guidelines and registered its protocol in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023440934). Here, we included controlled rodent animal models comparing NMDA antagonist use with a placebo treatment. Outcome measures included the reduction of cerebral edema, Neurobehavioral Severity Scale, and adverse effects. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings terms related to traumatic brain injury and NMDA receptor antagonists. The Collaborative Approach to Meta Analysis and Review of Animal Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) checklist and Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation's (SYRCLE's) tools were used to measure the quality and bias of included studies. The synthesis of results was presented in a meta-analysis of standard mean difference. Sixteen studies were included, with the predominant drugs being ifenprodil, MK-801, magnesium, and HU-211. The subjects consisted of Sprague-Dawley or Sabra rats. The analysis showed a significant reduction in brain edema with NMDA antagonist treatment (Standardized mean difference [SMD] - 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.59 to - 0.74, p < 0.01), despite high heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
39138715What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.