ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Computed tomography coronary angiography : What does the nonradiologist expect from the radiologist?]
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has become a central tool for the primary diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Its integration into the service catalog of the German statutory health insurance will not only transform the way patients are examined and treated but also enhance the collaboration between nonradiologists and radiologists.
objectiveThis article explores the requirements nonradiologists have for CCTA and identifies ways to promote successful interdisciplinary communication. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study addresses criteria for proper patient selection and preparation for CCTA. It considers the perspectives and needs of patients and various medical specialties, highlighting essential aspects of interdisciplinary communication.
resultsCCTA enables precise clarification of CAD and should be used for patients with a pretest probability of chronic CAD between 15 and 50%. Clear action plans in the diagnostic report are crucial to assist general practitioners and cardiologists in treatment planning. Patients expect clear information about the procedure, possible risks, and results.
conclusionClose collaboration between various medical disciplines is essential for the successful implementation of CCTA. Clear, structured diagnostic reports with annotated images, along with regular case discussions and feedback loops, can improve report interpretation and interdisciplinary communication. Patient-friendly reports can make diagnostic results more understandable and enhance patient adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39138672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.