Trial reportJournal of neurology2024
Switching from inotersen to eplontersen in patients with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy: analysis from NEURO-TTRansform.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Baseline Polyneuropathy Severity on Eplontersen Efficacy in the NEURO-TTRansform Clinical Trial.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2026Trial
- Eplontersen for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Polyneuropathy: An Exploratory Analysis of Treatment Effect in Male and Female Patients.Muscle & nerve · 2026Trial
- Effect of Eplontersen in Patients With Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Polyneuropathy Across Genetic Variants: An Exploratory Analysis From the NEURO-TTRansform Trial.European journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Disease modifying treatment of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in Germany - expert consensus of the German society of amyloid diseases (DGAK) and the German neurological society (DGN).Neurological research and practice · 2026Review
- The impact of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapeutics on the future of rare disease drug discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2026Article
- RNA-Based Therapies for Inherited Metabolic Disorders.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of the Management of Light-Chain (AL) and Transthyretin (ATTR) Cardiac Amyloidosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Models for Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: From Mechanistic Insights to Therapeutic Discovery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Emerging, novel gene-modulating therapies for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe phase 3 NEURO-TTRansform trial showed eplontersen treatment for 65 weeks reduced transthyretin (TTR), halted progression of neuropathy impairment, and improved quality of life (QoL) in adult patients with hereditary TTR-mediated amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv-PN), vs. historical placebo.
methodsNEURO-TTRansform enrolled patients with ATTRv-PN. A subset of patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous inotersen 300 mg weekly (Weeks 1-34) and subsequently switched to subcutaneous eplontersen 45 mg every 4 weeks (Weeks 37-81). Change in serum TTR and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated through Week 85. Effects on neuropathy impairment, QoL, and nutritional status were also evaluated.
resultsOf 24 patients randomized to inotersen, 20 (83%) switched to eplontersen at Week 37 and four discontinued due to AEs/investigator decision. Absolute change in serum TTR was greater after switching from inotersen (-74.3%; Week 35) to eplontersen (-80.6%; Week 85). From the end of inotersen treatment, neuropathy impairment and QoL were stable (i.e., did not progress) while on eplontersen, and there was no deterioration in nutritional status. TEAEs were fewer with eplontersen (Weeks 37-85; 19/20 [95%] patients) compared with inotersen (up to Week 35; 24/24 [100%] patients). Mean platelet counts decreased during inotersen treatment (mean nadir reduction ‒40.7%) and returned to baseline during eplontersen treatment (mean nadir reduction, ‒3.2%).
conclusionsSwitching from inotersen to eplontersen further reduced serum TTR, halted disease progression, stabilized QoL, restored platelet count, and improved tolerability, without deterioration in nutritional status. This supports a positive benefit-risk profile for patients with ATTRv-PN who switch from inotersen to eplontersen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.