ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2024
Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cross-sectional study using a nationwide inpatient database.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFasudil and ozagrel are drugs with the same indications for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in Japan. However, there have been no definitive conclusions on the clinical efficacy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium monotherapy or their combination. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the combined administration of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium in Japanese patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
methodsThis cross-sectional study used Diagnosis Procedure Combination data to assess patients who were hospitalized with SAH and received fasudil hydrochloride or ozagrel sodium between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 17,346). The participants were divided into three groups based on the treatment received: fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy (F group, n = 10,484), ozagrel sodium monotherapy (O group, n = 465), and fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy (FO group, n = 6,397). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis (significance level, 5%) was used for data analyses.
resultsThe results of the multivariable analysis, adjusted for factors considered to impact prognosis, showed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with the F group as the reference for in-hospital mortality was 0.94 in the FO group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.08, p = 0.355), with no differences compared to the F group.
conclusionFasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium had different mechanisms of action, suggesting a synergistic effect of combination therapy. However, a comparison of fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy and combination therapy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium showed no difference in the prognostic effect. Therefore, it was suggested that fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy may be sufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.