SynthesisClinical epigenetics2024
DNA methylation markers for oral cancer detection in non- and minimally invasive samples: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Smoking and oral and pharyngeal cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Tumor Biomarkers in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Etiology and Pathogenesis to Treatment Response-A Scoping Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Current Trends in Diagnosis and Early Monitoring of Oral Cavity Cancer: Techniques and Biomarkers.Cancers · 2026Review
- A scientometric study on methylation modification and identification of related genes in oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy - a narrative review with an update on current US governmental clinical trials targeting immunotherapy.Future science OA · 2025Review
- Leveraging Dental Biotechnology for Population Oral Health: Innovations in Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic and Epigenetic Biomarkers for the Early Oral Cancerization Risk in Periodontitis Patients.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Examination of DNA Methylation Patterns in Children Born Premature with Prenatal Tobacco Smoke Exposure.Toxics · 2025Article
- Cell-Free DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oral Carcinogenesis and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Translational Perspective.Cancers · 2025Review
- Molecular and Genetic Pathogenesis of Oral Cancer: A Basis for Customized Diagnosis and Treatment.Biology · 2025Review
- Effects of Ionizing Radiation on DNA Methylation Patterns and Their Potential as Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Salivary Biomarkers and Their Link to Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Diagnostic and Translational Perspectives in a Narrative Review.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Salivary cell-free DNA methylation analysis for oncological monitoring of surgical resection of oral squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-current status and future prospects.Academia oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More than 50% of oral cancer (OC) patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease associated with poor prognosis and quality of life, supporting an urgent need to improve early OC detection. The identification of effective molecular markers by minimally invasive approaches has emerged as a promising strategy for OC screening. This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the performance of the DNA methylation markers identified in non- or minimally invasive samples for OC detection. PubMed's MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies that evaluated DNA methylation markers in non-invasive and/or minimally invasive samples (oral rinse/saliva, oral brush, and blood) from OC patients. Two investigators independently extracted data on study population characteristics, candidate methylation markers, testing samples, DNA methylation assay, and performance diagnostic outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2 tool. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. DNA methylation markers were evaluated in oral rinse/saliva (n = 17), oral brush (n = 9), and blood (n = 7) samples. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and quantitative-MSP were the most common DNA methylation assays. Regarding diagnostic performance values for salivary, oral brush, and blood DNA methylation markers, sensitivity and specificity ranged between 3.4-100% and 21-100%, 9-100% and 26.8-100%, 22-70% and 45.45-100%, respectively. Different gene methylation panels showed good diagnostic performance for OC detection. This systematic review discloses the promising value of testing DNA methylation markers in non-invasive (saliva or oral rinse) or minimally invasive (oral brush or blood) samples as a novel strategy for OC detection. However, further validation in large, multicenter, and prospective study cohorts must be carried out to confirm the clinical value of specific DNA methylation markers in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.