Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138538›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2024

Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.

Sissel Eikeland Husebø, Inger Åse Reierson, Anette Hansen, Hilde Solli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sissel Eikeland HusebøDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Post Box 8600, 4036, Stavanger, Norway. sissel.i.husebo@uis.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-5730
Inger Åse ReiersonDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Research Group Clinical Competence in Nursing Education, University of South-Eastern Norway, Post Box 4, 3199, Borre, Norway.
Anette HansenDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Research Group Clinical Competence in Nursing Education, University of South-Eastern Norway, Post Box 4, 3199, Borre, Norway.
Hilde SolliDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Research Group Clinical Competence in Nursing Education, University of South-Eastern Norway, Post Box 4, 3199, Borre, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe voice of the students should be engaged in simulation curriculum development. Involving the students in the development of debriefing strategies might result in a deeper understanding of learning. However, few studies have investigated the students' perspectives on debriefing strategies. The aim of the study was to explore nursing students' perspectives on the post-simulation debriefing.

methodsAn explorative, descriptive design with a qualitative approach was used. Data were collected in December 2017 and May 2018 through focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students in Norway immediately after a 2-day high-fidelity simulation course in the second year of their Bachelor of Nursing degree. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.

resultsThirty-two nursing students participated in the study. The data analysis identified two main categories. The category 'Facilitator as a catalyst for reflection' illustrated the facilitator's multifaceted and vital role in initiating and guiding the students' reflection process in the debriefing. The category 'A process towards increased awareness' encompasses the students' guided process of acquiring new insight into their professional development, and how they put parts together to see the wholeness in what was simulated.

conclusionsThis study provides knowledge to facilitators regarding nursing students' perspectives on facilitating reflection and learning during debriefing discussions. The facilitator's multifaceted role in guiding the students' reflections and their process of acquiring new insight into their professional development were identified as critical to learning during debriefing.

Indexed as

DebriefingFacilitatorFocus group interviewsNursing studentsQualitative studyReflectionReflective practiceSimulation-based learningSystematic text condensation

Identifiers

PMID39138538
PMCPMC11320937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.