ArticlePlant methods2024
Orchid2024: A cultivar-level dataset and methodology for fine-grained classification of Chinese Cymbidium Orchids.
Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChinese Cymbidium orchids, cherished for their deep-rooted cultural significance and significant economic value in China, have spawned a rich tapestry of cultivars. However, these orchid cultivars are facing challenges from insufficient cultivation practices and antiquated techniques, including cultivar misclassification, complex identification, and the proliferation of counterfeit products. Current commercial techniques and academic research primarily emphasize species identification of orchids, rather than delving into that of orchid cultivars within species.
resultsTo bridge this gap, the authors dedicated over a year to collecting a cultivar image dataset for Chinese Cymbidium orchids named Orchid2024. This dataset contains over 150,000 images spanning 1,275 different categories, involving visits to 20 cities across 12 provincial administrative regions in China to gather pertinent data. Subsequently, we introduced various visual parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods to expedite model development, achieving the highest top-1 accuracy of 86.14% and top-5 accuracy of 95.44%.
conclusionExperimental results demonstrate the complexity of the dataset while highlighting the considerable promise of PEFT methods within flower image classification. We believe that our work not only provides a practical tool for orchid researchers, growers and market participants, but also provides a unique and valuable resource for further exploring fine-grained image classification tasks. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/pengyingshu/Orchid2024 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.