ReviewBMC neurology2024
Successful spinal cord stimulation using fast-acting sub-perception therapy for postoperative neuropathic pain of syringomyelia with Chiari malformation type 1: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in managing refractory upper-extremity pain.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral neuropathic pain after foramen magnum decompression (FMD) for Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) with syringomyelia can be residual and refractory. Here we present a case of refractory central neuropathic pain after FMD in a CM-1 patient with syringomyelia who achieved improvements in pain following spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using fast-acting sub-perception therapy (FAST™). CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old woman presented with a history of several years of bilateral upper extremity and chest-back pain. CM-1 and syringomyelia were diagnosed. The pain proved drug resistant, so FMD was performed for pain relief. After FMD, magnetic resonance imaging showed shrinkage of the syrinx. Pain was relieved, but bilateral finger, upper arm and thoracic back pain flared-up 10 months later. Due to pharmacotherapy resistance, SCS was planned for the purpose of improving pain. A percutaneous trial of SCS showed no improvement of pain with conventional SCS alone or in combination with Contour™, but the combination of FAST™ and Contour™ did improve pain. Three years after FMD, percutaneous leads and an implantable pulse generator were implanted. The program was set to FAST™ and Contour™. After implantation, pain as assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire and visual analog scale was relieved even after reducing dosages of analgesic. No adverse events were encountered.
conclusionPercutaneously implanted SCS using FAST™ may be effective for refractory pain after FMD for CM-1 with syringomyelia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.