Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138422›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2024

Grazing camels under semi-extensive production system: selectivity, feed intake capacity, digestion and energy expenditure.

Ahmed R Askar, Abdallah Masoud, Nasr E El-Bordeny, Khalid Z Kewan, Etab R I Abd El-Galil, Samir S Abou El Ezz, Mohsen M Shoukry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed R AskarAnimal and Poultry Nutrition Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt. ahmed_askar@yahoo.com.
Abdallah MasoudAnimal and Poultry Nutrition Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Nasr E El-BordenyAnimal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Khalid Z KewanAnimal and Poultry Nutrition Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Etab R I Abd El-GalilAnimal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Samir S Abou El EzzAnimal and Poultry Physiology Department, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohsen M ShoukryAnimal Production Department, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt was proposed that camels are more effective than other livestock species in selecting plants for their nutritional value. They may self-regulate their voluntary feed intake to satisfy their nutritional needs. This study was designed to investigate camels' feeding selectivity and ability to cover nutritional requirements when grazing alfalfa (high in protein) and/ or barley (high in energy) in a desert climate.

methodsEighteen lactating camels were equally divided into three feeding treatments. They grazed daily on alfalfa, barley, or a mixed pasture of both, for two periods of one month each. The concentrate supplement was individually administered at 40 g/kg BW

resultsDuring the first period, camels had a greater forage intake and digestibility when they grazed barley rather than alfalfa, while those grazing mixed pasture performed intermediately. In the second period, camels had a similar forage intake and digestibility among treatments due to a decline in barley intake and digestibility compared to the first period, which was expected since the preferred plant part gradually shifted from barley grains to predominantly straw as a function of time. Similar HR and EE were found across periods and treatments. As a result of greater gross and digestible energy intake in period 1, a better energy balance in period 1 was observed compared to period 2. Camels better utilize barley than alfalfa. Grazing on barley had a higher energy balance than grazing alfalfa alone or in combination with barley. However, camels grazing barley produced lower milk yield and energy than those grazing alfalfa alone or in combination with barley, with no interaction detected between period and treatment.

conclusionsLactating camels are able to self-regulate their voluntary intake to cover their energy requirements when they are grazing barley and/or alfalfa supplemented with a concentrate supplement at 40 g/kg BW

Indexed as

Animal FeedCamelusDigestionEnergy MetabolismHordeumMedicago sativaAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleLactationDigestibilityEnergy utilizationGrazing camelsHeart ratePlant selectivity

Identifiers

PMID39138422
PMCPMC11321051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.