ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2024
Which interventions could prevent early childhood caries in pregnant women, new mothers, and other primary caregivers?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
data sourcesCochrane Oral Health's Trials Register, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL EBSCO, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs assessing the effects of interventions targeted at pregnant women, new mothers or other primary caregivers for preventing early childhood caries (ECC) in infants during the first year of life. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Selection of studies, data extraction and management, and assessment of risk of bias in the included studies were independently performed by two authors.
resultsTwenty-three trials met the inclusion criteria. Child diet and feeding practices advice could reduce the risk of developing dental caries in primary teeth by 15% with the evidence being of moderate certainty. All other measures showed little to no difference compared to standard care, with evidence of low to very low certainty.
conclusionsGenerally, the evidence assessing the effects of interventions targeted at pregnant women and new mother for preventing early childhood caries (ECC) in infants during the first year of life is of low to very low certainty. More robust RCTs are needed to inform practice and policy making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39138370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.