Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138355›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2025

The role of body image dissatisfaction in the relationship between body size and disordered eating and self-harm: complimentary Mendelian randomization and mediation analyses.

Grace M Power, Naomi Warne, Helen Bould, Francesco Casanova, Samuel E Jones, Tom G Richardson, Jessica Tyrrell, George Davey Smith, Jon Heron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Grace M PowerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. grace.power@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-7728
Naomi WarneCentre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-8982
Helen BouldMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8163-3210
Francesco CasanovaGenetics of Complex Traits, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0275-4765
Samuel E JonesInstitute for Molecular Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0153-922X
Tom G RichardsonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7918-2040
Jessica TyrrellGenetics of Complex Traits, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9256-6065
George Davey Smith *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-8314
Jon Heron *MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6199-5644

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences SBF004\1079Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/2RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00032/01RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00032/02RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/N0137941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disordered eating and self-harm commonly co-occur in young people suggesting potential for shared underlying causes. Body image dissatisfaction (BID) has been recognised as a psychological correlate of body size, associated with both disordered eating and self-harm. However, the investigation into etiological pathways early in the lifecourse to provide detail on how body size and BID may foster disordered eating and self-harm remains largely unexplored. Employing data from two large population-based cohorts, the UK Biobank and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents And Children (ALSPAC), we conducted bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) to determine the causal direction of effect between genetically predicted prepubertal body size and two measures of BID indicating (i) desire to be smaller, and (ii) desire to be larger. We then used multivariable regression followed by counterfactual mediation analyses. Bidirectional MR indicated robust evidence that increased genetically predicted prepubertal body size increased desire to be smaller and decreased desire to be larger. Evidence for the reverse causal direction was negligible. These findings remained very similar across sensitivity analyses. In females and males, multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that being overweight increased the risk of disordered eating (risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19, 1.01 to 1.40 and 1.98, 1.28 to 3.05, respectively) and self-harm (RR, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.04 to 1.77 and 1.55, 0.86 to 2.81, respectively), while being underweight was protective against disordered eating (RR, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.40 to 0.81 and 0.81, 0.38 to 1.73, respectively). There was weak evidence of an increase in the risk of self-harm among underweight individuals. Mediation analyses indicated that the relationship between being overweight and subsequent disordered eating was largely mediated by the desire to be smaller. Our research carries important public health implications, suggesting distinct risk profiles for self-harm and disordered eating in relation to weight and body image. In addition, a better understanding of genetically predicted prepubertal BID may be valuable in the prevention and treatment of disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence.

Indexed as

Body DissatisfactionBody SizeFeeding and Eating DisordersSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentAdultBody ImageChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMediation AnalysisMendelian Randomization AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39138355
PMCPMC11746148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.