Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138338›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Reproducibility and across-site transferability of an improved deep learning approach for aneurysm detection and segmentation in time-of-flight MR-angiograms.

Marius Vach, Luisa Wolf, Daniel Weiss, Vivien Lorena Ivan, Björn B Hofmann, Ludmila Himmelspach, Julian Caspers, Christian Rubbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marius VachDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Luisa WolfDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. luisa.wolf2@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Daniel WeissDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Vivien Lorena IvanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Björn B HofmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ludmila HimmelspachHeine Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science (HeiCAD), Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Julian Caspers *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian Rubbert *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) replicate a deep-learning-based model for cerebral aneurysm segmentation in TOF-MRAs, (2) improve the approach by testing various fully automatic pre-processing pipelines, and (3) rigorously validate the model's transferability on independent, external test-datasets. A convolutional neural network was trained on 235 TOF-MRAs acquired on local scanners from a single vendor to segment intracranial aneurysms. Different pre-processing pipelines including bias field correction, resampling, cropping and intensity-normalization were compared regarding their effect on model performance. The models were tested on independent, external same-vendor and other-vendor test-datasets, each comprised of 70 TOF-MRAs, including patients with and without aneurysms. The best-performing model achieved excellent results on the external same-vendor test-dataset, surpassing the results of the previous publication with an improved sensitivity (0.97 vs. ~ 0.86), a higher Dice score coefficient (DSC, 0.60 ± 0.25 vs. 0.53 ± 0.31), and an improved false-positive rate (0.87 ± 1.35 vs. ~ 2.7 FPs/case). The model further showed excellent performance in the external other-vendor test-datasets (DSC 0.65 ± 0.26; sensitivity 0.92, 0.96 ± 2.38 FPs/case). Specificity was 0.38 and 0.53, respectively. Raising the voxel-size from 0.5 × 0.5×0.5 mm to 1 × 1×1 mm reduced the false-positive rate seven-fold. This study successfully replicated core principles of a previous approach for detecting and segmenting cerebral aneurysms in TOF-MRAs with a robust, fully automatable pre-processing pipeline. The model demonstrated robust transferability on two independent external datasets using TOF-MRAs from the same scanner vendor as the training dataset and from other vendors. These findings are very encouraging regarding the clinical application of such an approach.

Indexed as

Deep LearningIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsConvolutional neural networkDeep learningIntracranial aneurysmMagnetic resonance angiographyReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID39138338
PMCPMC11322557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.