Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138248›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Visual background information modulates motor contagions in humans.

Hiroto Saito, Kentaro Fukuchi, Masahiko Inami, Gowrishankar Ganesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiroto SaitoResearch Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan. hiroto.saito@star.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Kentaro FukuchiSchool of Interdisciplinary Mathematical Science, Meiji University, 4-21-1 Nakano, Nakano-ku, Tokyo, 164-8525, Japan.
Masahiko InamiResearch Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan.
Gowrishankar GaneshUM-CNRS Laboratoire d'Informatique de Robotique et de Microelectronique de Montpellier (LIRMM), 161, Rue Ada, Montpellier, France.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 21K17786JST ERATO JPMJER1701JST Moonshot R&D Program JPMJMS2292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor contagions refer to implicit effects induced by the observation of actions made by others on one's own actions. A plethora of studies conducted over the last two decades have demonstrated that both observed and predicted actions can induce various kinds of motor contagions in a human observer. However, motor contagions have always been investigated with regard to different features of an observed action, and it remains unclear whether the background environment in which an observed action takes place modulates motor contagions as well. Here, we investigated participant movements in an empirical hand steering task during which the participants were required to move a cursor through a visual channel after being presented with videos of an actor performing the same task. We manipulated the congruency between the actions shown in the video and the background channels and examined whether and how they affected the participants' own movements. We observed a clear interaction between the observed action and its background. The movement time of the participants' actions tended to increase or decrease depending on whether they observed a faster or slower movement, respectively, and these changes were amplified if the background was not congruent with the action contained within it. These results suggest that background information can modulate motor contagions in humans.

Indexed as

MovementPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHandHumansMalePhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39138248
PMCPMC11322384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.