ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of a robust and generalizable algorithm "gQuant" for accurate normalizer gene selection in qRT-PCR analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal and genotype-dependent transcriptomic responses to cold treatment and recovery in winter rapeseed (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Advances in algorithms for normalizer gene selection in qRT-PCR: implications for cancer biology and precision medicine.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Integrating miRNA profiling and machine learning for improved prostate cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of qRT-PCR Data to Identify the Most Stable Reference Gene Using gQuant.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergent role of nucleic acid-based biomarkers-microRNAs(miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs(lncRNAs), and messenger RNAs(mRNAs), is becoming increasingly prominent in disease diagnostics and risk assessment. qRT-PCR is the primary analytical method for quantitative measurement of biomarkers. Yet, the relative infancy of non-coding RNAs recognition as biomarkers poses a challenge due to the absence of a consensus on a universally accepted normalizer gene, an absolute requirement for accurate quantification. Current tools normalizer selection are fraught with statistical limitations and suboptimal graphical user interface for data visualisation. These deficiencies underscore the necessity for a balanced tool tailored to handle qRT-PCR datasets. Addressing the identified challenges, we have developed 'gQuant' tool crafted to address these limitations. We employed voting classifiers that combine predictions from multiple statistical methods. Tool's efficacy was validated through different available and in house data derived from urinary exosomal miRNAs datasets. Comparative analysis with existing tools revealed that their integrated methodologies could skew the ranking of normalizer genes, whereas 'gQuant' consistently yielded rankings characterised by lower standard-deviation, reduced covariance, and enhanced kernel density estimation values. Given 'gQuant's' promising performance, normalizer gene identification will be greatly improved, improving precision of gene expression quantification in a variety of research scenarios. The gQuant tool developed for this study is available for public use and can be accessed at [ https://github.com/ABHAYHBB/gQuant-Tool ]."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.