ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparative long-term prognosis of early surgery and surgery after surveillance for patients with ground-glass nodule adenocarcinomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Expert Consensus on Precision Management of Pulmonary Nodules (2026 Version)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Article
- Evaluation of high-grade growth patterns in invasive adenocarcinomas manifesting as ground-glass lesions via clinical and qualitative and quantitative computed tomography features.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the pathological results and long-term survival results of early surgery and surgery after at least one year follow-up for ground-glass component predominant lung adenocarcinoma patients. From January 1, 2013 to August 31, 2017, a total of 279 patients with ground-glass nodules (GGNs) undergoing surgical resection and pathologically proved to be pulmonary adenocarcinoma were included in this study. All patients were divided into early surgery group (ES Group) (210 cases) and surgery after follow-up group (FS Group) (69 cases). Patients in FS group experienced at least one year surveillance. Clinical and imaging features were analyzed by using univariate analysis. After analysis, there was no statistical difference in pathological results and long-term prognosis between the two groups. In the follow-up group, grown GGNs have proved to have more aggressive pathological results. The one-year follow-up may be a feasible management method for patients with ground-glass component predominant GGN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.