Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39138096›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2024

Physiological presentation and risk factors of long COVID in the UK using smartphones and wearable devices: a longitudinal, citizen science, case-control study.

Callum Stewart, Yatharth Ranjan, Pauline Conde, Shaoxiong Sun, Yuezhou Zhang, Zulqarnain Rashid, Heet Sankesara, Nicholas Cummins, Petroula Laiou, Xi Bai and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Callum StewartDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Yatharth RanjanDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Pauline CondeDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Shaoxiong SunDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Yuezhou ZhangDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Zulqarnain RashidDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Heet SankesaraDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Nicholas CumminsDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Petroula LaiouDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Xi BaiInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Richard J B DobsonDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Amos A FolarinDepartment of Health Informatics and Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: amos.folarin@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of long COVID as a COVID-19 sequela was largely syndromic in characterisation. Digital health technologies such as wearable devices open the possibility to study this condition with passive, objective data in addition to self-reported symptoms. We aimed to quantify the prevalence and severity of symptoms across collected mobile health metrics over 12 weeks following COVID-19 diagnosis and to identify risk factors for the development of post-COVID-19 condition (also known as long COVID).

methodsThe Covid Collab study was a longitudinal, self-enrolled, community, case-control study. We recruited participants from the UK through a smartphone app, media publications, and promotion within the Fitbit app between Aug 28, 2020, and May 31, 2021. Adults (aged ≥18 years) who reported a COVID-19 diagnosis with a positive antigen or PCR test before Feb 1, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. We compared a cohort of 1200 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 with a cohort of 3600 sex-matched and age-matched controls without a COVID-19 diagnosis. Participants could provide information on COVID-19 symptoms and mental health through self-reported questionnaires (active data) and commercial wearable fitness devices (passive data). Data were compared between cohorts at three periods following diagnosis: acute COVID-19 (0-4 weeks), ongoing COVID-19 (4-12 weeks), and post-COVID-19 (12-16 weeks). We assessed sociodemographic and mobile health risk factors for the development of long COVID (defined as either a persistent change in a physiological signal or self-reported symptoms for ≥12 weeks after COVID-19 diagnosis).

findingsBy Aug 1, 2022, 17 667 participants had enrolled into the study, of whom 1200 (6·8%) cases and 3600 (20·4%) controls were included in the analyses. Compared with baseline (65 beats per min), resting heart rate increased significantly during the acute (0·47 beats per min; odds ratio [OR] 1·06 [95% CI 1·03-1·09]; p<0·0001), ongoing (0·99 beats per min; 1·11 [1·08-1·14]; p<0·0001), and post-COVID-19 (0·52 beats per min; 1·04 [1·02-1·07]; p=0·0017) phases. An increased level of historical activity in the period from 24 months to 6 months preceding COVID-19 diagnosis was protective against long COVID (coefficient -0·017 [95% CI -0·030 to -0·003]; p=0·015). Depressive symptoms were persistently elevated following COVID-19 (OR 1·03 [95% CI 1·01-1·06]; p=0·0033) and were a potential risk factor for developing long COVID (1·14 [1·07-1·22]; p<0·0001).

interpretationMobile health technologies and commercial wearable devices might prove to be a useful resource for tracking recovery from COVID-19 and the prevalence of its long-term sequelae, as well as representing an abundant source of historical data. Mental wellbeing can be impacted negatively for an extended period following COVID-19.

fundingNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, UK Research and Innovation, and Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

COVID-19Post-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSmartphoneWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39138096
PMCPMC11832456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.