Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39137885›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

A century of wild bee sampling: historical data and neural network analysis reveal ecological traits associated with species loss.

Kelsey K Graham, Paul Glaum, Joseph Hartert, Jason Gibbs, Erika Tucker, Rufus Isaacs, Fernanda S Valdovinos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelsey K GrahamUSDA-ARS-PWA Pollinating Insect Research Unit , Logan, UT 84341, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-0202
Paul GlaumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7451-8369
Joseph HartertDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jason GibbsDepartment of Entomology, University of Manitoba , Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2.
Erika TuckerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Rufus IsaacsDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Fernanda S ValdovinosDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5270-5286

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-68004-26323National Science Foundation DBI-2216927National Science Foundation DEB-1834497National Science Foundation DEB-2129757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analysed the wild bee community sampled from 1921 to 2018 at a nature preserve in southern Michigan, USA, to study long-term community shifts in a protected area. During an intensive survey in 1972 and 1973, Francis C. Evans detected 135 bee species. In the most recent intensive surveys conducted in 2017 and 2018, we recorded 90 species. Only 58 species were recorded in both sampling periods, indicating a significant shift in the bee community. We found that the bee community diversity, species richness and evenness were all lower in recent samples. Additionally, 64% of the more common species exhibited a more than 30% decline in relative abundance. Neural network analysis of species traits revealed that extirpation from the reserve was most likely for oligolectic ground-nesting bees and kleptoparasitic bees, whereas polylectic cavity-nesting bees were more likely to persist. Having longer phenological ranges also increased the chance of persistence in polylectic species. Further analysis suggests a climate response as bees in the contemporary sampling period had a more southerly overall distribution compared to the historic community. Results exhibit the utility of both long-term data and machine learning in disentangling complex indicators of bee population trajectories.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAnimalsBeesConservation of Natural ResourcesMichiganNeural Networks, Computerbee declinecommunity analysisconservationnature preserveneural networkpollinator

Identifiers

PMID39137885
PMCPMC11321864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.