Observational studyJournal of affective disorders2024
Digital phenotyping of depression during pregnancy using self-report data.
Observational study in Journal of affective disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review of the application of digital phenotyping in predicting peripartum depressive symptoms.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Incorporating end-user perspectives into the development of a machine learning algorithm for first time perinatal depression prediction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Targeted Research and Treatment Implications in Women With Depression.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025Review
- Usability and Acceptability of a Pregnancy App for Substance Use Screening and Education: A Mixed Methods Exploratory Pilot Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression is a common pregnancy complication yet is often under-detected and, subsequently, undertreated. Data collected through mobile health tools may be used to support the identification of depression symptoms in pregnancy.
methodsAn observational cohort study of 2062 pregnancies collected self-reports of patient history, mood, pregnancy-specific symptoms, and written language using a prenatal support app. These app inputs were used to model depression risk in subsequent 30- and 60-day periods throughout pregnancy. A selective inference lasso modeling approach examined the individual and additive value of each type of patient-reported app input.
resultsDepression models ranged in predictive power (AUC value of 0.64-0.83), depending on the type of inputs. The most predictive model included personal history, daily mood, and acute pregnancy-related symptoms (e.g., severe vomiting, cramping). Across models, daily mood was the strongest indicator of depression symptoms in the following month. Models that retained natural language inputs typically improved predictive accuracy and offered insight into the lived context associated with experiencing depression. LIMITATIONS: Our findings are not generalizable beyond a digitally literate patient population that is self-motivated to report data during pregnancy.
conclusionsSimple patient reported data, including sparse language, shared directly via digital tools may support earlier depression symptom identification and a more nuanced understanding of depression context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.