ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024
Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Predict the Appropriate Treatment of Acute Hip Fractures in Older Adults? Comparing Appropriate Use Criteria With Recommendations From ChatGPT.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChatGPT in Orthopedic Trauma: Consistency, Accuracy, and Agreement With Textbook and Expert Opinion.Cureus · 2026Article
- Exploring the Role of AI in Managing Treatment Recommendations for Lymphedema: International, Multidisciplinary, Multiprofessional Survey Study of Trust, Reliability, and Impact on Decision-Making.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Intelligent Rehabilitation: Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2026Review
- Retrieval-augmented generation for interpreting clinical laboratory regulations using large language models.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence fails to outperform orthopaedic surgeons: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Exploring ChatGPT's Efficacy in Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Questions Compared to Adult Reconstruction Surgeons.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Can generative artificial intelligence provide accurate medical advice?: a case of ChatGPT versus Congress of Neurological Surgeons management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries clinical guidelines.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- ChatGPT and Google Gemini are Clinically Inadequate in Providing Recommendations on Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Compared to American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
- Discrepancies in ChatGPT's Hip Fracture Recommendations in Older Adults for 2021 AAOS Evidence-Based Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in graduate medical education.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- ChatGPT-4o Mini Fabricates and Miscites Evidence for American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Hip Fracture Clinical Practice Guidelines.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute hip fractures are a public health problem affecting primarily older adults. Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer may be useful in providing appropriate clinical recommendations for beneficial treatment.
objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4.0 by comparing its appropriateness scores for acute hip fractures with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria given 30 patient scenarios. "Appropriateness" indicates the unexpected health benefits of treatment exceed the expected negative consequences by a wide margin.
methodsUsing the AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria as the benchmark, numerical scores from 1 to 9 assessed appropriateness. For each patient scenario, ChatGPT-4.0 was asked to assign an appropriate score for six treatments to manage acute hip fractures.
resultsThirty patient scenarios were evaluated for 180 paired scores. Comparing ChatGPT-4.0 with AAOS scores, there was a positive correlation for multiple cannulated screw fixation, total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails. Statistically significant differences were observed only between scores for long cephalomedullary nails.
conclusionChatGPT-4.0 scores were not concordant with AAOS scores, overestimating the appropriateness of total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails, and underestimating the other three. ChatGPT-4.0 was inadequate in selecting an appropriate treatment deemed acceptable, most reasonable, and most likely to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.