Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39137403›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024

Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Predict the Appropriate Treatment of Acute Hip Fractures in Older Adults? Comparing Appropriate Use Criteria With Recommendations From ChatGPT.

Katrina S Nietsch, Nancy Shrestha, Laura C Mazudie Ndjonko, Wasil Ahmed, Mateo Restrepo Mejia, Bashar Zaidat, Renee Ren, Akiro H Duey, Samuel Q Li, Jun S Kim and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katrina S NietschFrom the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (Ms. Nietsch, Mr. Ahmed, Mr. Mejia, Mr. Zaidat, Ms. Ren, and Mr. Duey); the Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL (Ms. Shrestha); the Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (Ms. Mazudie Ndjonko); the PGY-6, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (Dr. Li); the Department of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (Dr. Kim); the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Dr. Hidden); and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (Dr. Cho).ORCID 0009-0007-1605-8193
Nancy Shrestha
Laura C Mazudie Ndjonko
Wasil Ahmed
Mateo Restrepo Mejia
Bashar Zaidat
Renee Ren
Akiro H Duey
Samuel Q Li
Jun S Kim
Krystin A Hidden
Samuel K Cho

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute hip fractures are a public health problem affecting primarily older adults. Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer may be useful in providing appropriate clinical recommendations for beneficial treatment.

objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4.0 by comparing its appropriateness scores for acute hip fractures with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria given 30 patient scenarios. "Appropriateness" indicates the unexpected health benefits of treatment exceed the expected negative consequences by a wide margin.

methodsUsing the AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria as the benchmark, numerical scores from 1 to 9 assessed appropriateness. For each patient scenario, ChatGPT-4.0 was asked to assign an appropriate score for six treatments to manage acute hip fractures.

resultsThirty patient scenarios were evaluated for 180 paired scores. Comparing ChatGPT-4.0 with AAOS scores, there was a positive correlation for multiple cannulated screw fixation, total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails. Statistically significant differences were observed only between scores for long cephalomedullary nails.

conclusionChatGPT-4.0 scores were not concordant with AAOS scores, overestimating the appropriateness of total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails, and underestimating the other three. ChatGPT-4.0 was inadequate in selecting an appropriate treatment deemed acceptable, most reasonable, and most likely to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleHemiarthroplastyHumansLanguageMalePractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39137403
PMCPMC11319315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.