Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39137222›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Biotic and abiotic factors affecting Atlantic ghost crab (Ocypode quadrata) spatiotemporal activity at an important shorebird nesting site in Virginia.

Mikayla N Call, Rasheed S Pongnon, Christy N Wails, Sarah M Karpanty, Kristy C Lapenta, Alexandra L Wilke, Ruth Boettcher, Camille R Alvino, James D Fraser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mikayla N CallDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1465-6556
Rasheed S PongnonDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Christy N WailsDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Sarah M KarpantyDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Kristy C LapentaDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Alexandra L WilkeThe Nature Conservancy in Virginia, Nassawadox, Virginia, United States of America.
Ruth BoettcherVirginia Department of Wildlife Resources, Machipongo, Virginia, United States of America.
Camille R AlvinoDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
James D FraserDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atlantic ghost crabs (Ocypode quadrata) are predators of beach-nesting shorebird nests and chicks on the United States' Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Ghost crabs may also disturb birds, altering foraging, habitat use, or nest and brood attendance patterns. Shorebird conservation strategies often involve predator and disturbance management to improve reproductive success, but efforts rarely target ghost crabs. Despite the threat to shorebird reproductive success, ghost crabs are a poorly understood part of the beach ecosystem and additional knowledge about ghost crab habitat selection is needed to inform shorebird conservation. We monitored ghost crab activity, defined as burrow abundance, throughout the shorebird breeding season on Metompkin Island, Virginia, an important breeding site for piping plovers (Charadrius melodus) and American oystercatchers (Haematopus palliatus). We counted burrows at shorebird nests and random locations throughout the breeding season and investigated whether ghost crab activity was greater at nest sites relative to random locations without shorebird nests. While we observed burrows at all nest sites (n = 63 nests), we found that burrow counts were lower at piping plover nests with shell cover, relative to random locations with no shell cover. Ghost crabs may avoid piping plover nest sites due to anti-predator behaviors from incubating adults or differences in microhabitat characteristics selected by piping plovers. We also investigated the effects of habitat type, date, and air temperature on the abundance of ghost crab burrows. We found that while crab burrows were present across the barrier island landscape, there were more burrows in sandy, undisturbed habitats behind the dunes, relative to wave-disturbed beach. Additionally, ghost crab activity increased later in the shorebird breeding season. Understanding when and where ghost crabs are most likely to be active in the landscape can aid decision-making to benefit imperiled shorebird populations.

Indexed as

BrachyuraEcosystemNesting BehaviorAnimalsBirdsPredatory BehaviorSeasonsVirginia

Identifiers

PMID39137222
PMCPMC11321587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.