Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39137217›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Knowledge, attitude and practice towards antibiotic use and resistance among the veterinarians in Bangladesh.

Md Samun Sarker, Sanjib Chandra Nath, Iftekhar Ahmed, Nure Alam Siddiky, Shariful Islam, Md Ehsanul Kabir, Zamila Bueaza Bupasha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Md Samun SarkerBangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Antimicrobial Resistance Action Center (ARAC), Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-5445-1040
Sanjib Chandra NathBangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Antimicrobial Resistance Action Center (ARAC), Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Iftekhar AhmedDepartment of Pharmacy, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nure Alam SiddikyBangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Antimicrobial Resistance Action Center (ARAC), Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shariful IslamInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), Mohakhali, Bangladesh.
Md Ehsanul KabirBangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Antimicrobial Resistance Action Center (ARAC), Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Zamila Bueaza BupashaBangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Antimicrobial Resistance Action Center (ARAC), Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of antimicrobial resistance is a growing human and animal health concern around the world. When a number of studies have emphasized the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) regarding antibiotic use and resistance in humans, little attention has been paid to the veterinary sector. The aim of this study was to understand the KAP towards antibiotic use and resistance among veterinarians in Bangladesh.

methodsA cross-sectional online based questionnaire survey was conducted from August to September 2020 among the registered veterinary practitioners. A self-administered Google form questionnaire consisting of 45 questions on knowledge, attitude and practice regarding antibiotic use and resistance was used. For statistical significance test we used Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test and logistic regression for factor analysis.

resultsA total of 208 registered veterinarians participated in this study. The study involved a majority of male participants, constituting 85.1%, while 54.8% of the participants held a Masters degree. Around 52% of the veterinarians were poultry practitioners. All respondents were familiar with antimicrobials. The participants (91.4%) knew that antibiotics cannot cure viral infections, while 97.6% believed that frequent antibiotic prescriptions rendered them less effective. Participants claimed that only they were eligible to prescribe drugs for the treatment of animals, and around 80% disagreed with adding antibiotics with feed/water as a growth promoter in livestock. Of the total participants, 87% believed that a local antimicrobial guideline would be more effective than an international one. A multivariable analysis revealed that male veterinarians have 2.37 times higher knowledge regarding antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) (OR = 2.37, CI = 1.01-5.59, p = 0.05). Veterinarians engaged in government services demonstrated a 2.59 times more favorable attitude towards AMU and AMR (OR = 2.59, CI = 0.99-6.73, p = 0.05). Additionally, respondents aged 31-35 were 0.45 times more likely to exhibit good practices (OR = 0.45, CI = 0.2-1.00, p = 0.05). However, gaps in practices were highlighted in our study, suggesting training deficiencies.

conclusionThe present study, for the first time conducted in Bangladesh, dictates that future interventions like academic courses, workshops, and seminars on antibiotic usage and resistance are needed to facilitate the knowledge, behavior and practice of veterinarians with regard to the rational use of antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVeterinariansAdultAnimalsBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID39137217
PMCPMC11321546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.