Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39137063›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2024

Social inequity in ageing in place among older adults in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries: a mixed studies systematic review.

Clara Bolster-Foucault, Isabelle Vedel, Giovanna Busa, Georgia Hacker, Nadia Sourial, Amélie Quesnel-Vallée

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contextualizing Age-Friendly Care Within Social Drivers of Health.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Owning, Renting and Environmental Proactivity: The Role of Housing Tenure in Hypothetical Housing Decisions.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clara Bolster-FoucaultDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1759-766X
Isabelle VedelDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Giovanna BusaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Georgia HackerDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nadia SourialDepartment of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Amélie Quesnel-ValléeDepartment of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

Canada Research Chair in Policies and Health InequalitiesCIHR 166208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost older adults wish to remain in their homes and communities as they age. Despite this widespread preference, disparities in health outcomes and access to healthcare and social support may create inequities in the ability to age in place. Our objectives were to synthesise evidence of social inequity in ageing in place among older adults using an intersectional lens and to evaluate the methods used to define and measure inequities.

methodsWe conducted a mixed studies systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AgeLine for quantitative or qualitative literature that examined social inequities in ageing in place among adults aged 65 and older in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries. Results of included studies were synthesised using qualitative content analysis guided by the PROGRESS-Plus framework.

resultsOf 4874 identified records, 55 studies were included. Rural residents, racial/ethnic minorities, immigrants and those with higher socioeconomic position and greater social resources are more likely to age in place. Women and those with higher educational attainment appear less likely to age in place. The influence of socioeconomic position, education and social resources differs by gender and race/ethnicity, indicating intersectional effects across social dimensions.

conclusionsSocial dimensions influence the ability to age in place in OECD settings, likely due to health inequalities across the lifespan, disparities in access to healthcare and support services, and different preferences regarding ageing in place. Our results can inform the development of policies and programmes to equitably support ageing in place in diverse populations.

Indexed as

Independent LivingSocioeconomic FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingDeveloped CountriesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleSocial Determinants of HealthSocial Supportageing in placehealth equityintersectionalitylong-term caremixed studies systematic reviewolder people

Identifiers

PMID39137063
PMCPMC11321251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.