Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39137045›Full record

ArticleAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists2025

Metabolic syndrome risk prediction in an Australian sample with first-episode psychosis using the psychosis metabolic risk calculator: A validation study.

Scott B Teasdale, Oliver Ardill-Young, Rachel Morell, Philip B Ward, Golam M Khandaker, Rachel Upthegrove, Jackie Curtis, Benjamin I Perry

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Scott B TeasdaleDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6769-8421
Oliver Ardill-YoungDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Rachel MorellDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Philip B WardDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Golam M KhandakerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel UpthegroveInstitute for Mental Health and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jackie CurtisDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Benjamin I PerryDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK and.ORCID 0000-0002-1533-026X

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/6Medical Research Council MR/S037675/1Medical Research Council MR/W014416/1Wellcome Trust 201486/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the accuracy and likely clinical usefulness of the Psychosis Metabolic Risk Calculator (PsyMetRiC) in predicting up-to six-year risk of incident metabolic syndrome in an Australian sample of young people with first-episode psychosis.

methodWe conducted a retrospective study at a secondary care early psychosis treatment service among people aged 16-35 years, extracting relevant data at the time of antipsychotic commencement and between one-to-six-years later. We assessed algorithm accuracy primarily via discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (calibration plots) and clinical usefulness (decision curve analysis). Model updating and recalibration generated a site-specific (Australian) PsyMetRiC version.

resultsWe included 116 people with baseline and follow-up data: 73% male, mean age 20.1 years, mean follow-up 2.6 years, metabolic syndrome prevalence 13%. C-statistics for both partial- (C = 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.75) and full-models (C = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.77) were acceptable; however, calibration plots demonstrated consistent under-prediction of risk. Recalibration and updating led to slightly improved C-statistics, greatly improved agreement between observed and predicted risk, and a narrow window of likely clinical usefulness improved significantly.

conclusionAn updated and recalibrated PsyMetRiC model, PsyMetRiC-Australia, shows promise. Validation in a large sample is required to confirm its accuracy and clinical usefulness for the Australian population.

Indexed as

Metabolic SyndromePsychotic DisordersAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentYoung Adultantipsychoticmental disordersmetabolic syndromepsychosisrisk predictionvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID39137045
PMCPMC11804134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.