Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39137031›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2024

Educational Utility of Clinical Vignettes Generated in Japanese by ChatGPT-4: Mixed Methods Study.

Hiromizu Takahashi, Kiyoshi Shikino, Takeshi Kondo, Akira Komori, Yuji Yamada, Mizue Saita, Toshio Naito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiromizu TakahashiDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5055-7937
Kiyoshi ShikinoDepartment of Community-Oriented Medical Education, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-3443
Takeshi KondoCenter for Postgraduate Clinical Training and Career Development, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3307-671X
Akira KomoriDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-3707
Yuji YamadaBrookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5452-5334
Mizue SaitaDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8438-0845
Toshio NaitoDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-9930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluating the accuracy and educational utility of artificial intelligence-generated medical cases, especially those produced by large language models such as ChatGPT-4 (developed by OpenAI), is crucial yet underexplored.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the educational utility of ChatGPT-4-generated clinical vignettes and their applicability in educational settings.

methodsUsing a convergent mixed methods design, a web-based survey was conducted from January 8 to 28, 2024, to evaluate 18 medical cases generated by ChatGPT-4 in Japanese. In the survey, 6 main question items were used to evaluate the quality of the generated clinical vignettes and their educational utility, which are information quality, information accuracy, educational usefulness, clinical match, terminology accuracy (TA), and diagnosis difficulty. Feedback was solicited from physicians specializing in general internal medicine or general medicine and experienced in medical education. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to identify differences among cases, and linear regression was used to examine trends associated with physicians' experience. Thematic analysis of qualitative feedback was performed to identify areas for improvement and confirm the educational utility of the cases.

resultsOf the 73 invited participants, 71 (97%) responded. The respondents, primarily male (64/71, 90%), spanned a broad range of practice years (from 1976 to 2017) and represented diverse hospital sizes throughout Japan. The majority deemed the information quality (mean 0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.79) and information accuracy (mean 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71) to be satisfactory, with these responses being based on binary data. The average scores assigned were 3.55 (95% CI 3.49-3.60) for educational usefulness, 3.70 (95% CI 3.65-3.75) for clinical match, 3.49 (95% CI 3.44-3.55) for TA, and 2.34 (95% CI 2.28-2.40) for diagnosis difficulty, based on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis showed significant variability in content quality and relevance across the cases (P<.001 after Bonferroni correction). Participants suggested improvements in generating physical findings, using natural language, and enhancing medical TA. The thematic analysis highlighted the need for clearer documentation, clinical information consistency, content relevance, and patient-centered case presentations.

conclusionsChatGPT-4-generated medical cases written in Japanese possess considerable potential as resources in medical education, with recognized adequacy in quality and accuracy. Nevertheless, there is a notable need for enhancements in the precision and realism of case details. This study emphasizes ChatGPT-4's value as an adjunctive educational tool in the medical field, requiring expert oversight for optimal application.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAdultClinical CompetenceEast Asian PeopleEducation, MedicalFemaleHumansJapanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAIartificial intelligenceChatGPT-4clinical vignettesgenerative AIJapanJapanesemedical case generationmedical education

Identifiers

PMID39137031
PMCPMC11350316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.