ArticleJMIR medical education2024
Educational Utility of Clinical Vignettes Generated in Japanese by ChatGPT-4: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding the Roles of Medical Educators in the Generative Artificial Intelligence Era: A Qualitative Study.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Evaluation of artificial intelligence-generated vignettes depicting patient chatbot use in psychiatric contexts.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry Training: Comparative Insights from Nine Large Language Models Across Cultural and Exam Contexts.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Article
- AI- vs Human-Based Assessment of Medical Interview Transcripts in a Generative AI-Simulated Patient System: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Objective Structured Clinical Examination Generation in Digital Health Education: Comparative Analysis of Three GPT-4o Configurations.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Large language model-generated versus teacher-written objective structured clinical examination stations for medical students: a blinded comparative pilot study.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Based Patient Simulation to Foster Communication Skills in Health Care Professionals: User-Centered Development and Usability Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Applications, Challenges, and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Applying ChatGPT to plan and create a realistic collection of virtual patients for clinical reasoning training.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Use and Evaluation of Generative Artificial Intelligence by Medical Students in Japan.JMA journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluating the accuracy and educational utility of artificial intelligence-generated medical cases, especially those produced by large language models such as ChatGPT-4 (developed by OpenAI), is crucial yet underexplored.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the educational utility of ChatGPT-4-generated clinical vignettes and their applicability in educational settings.
methodsUsing a convergent mixed methods design, a web-based survey was conducted from January 8 to 28, 2024, to evaluate 18 medical cases generated by ChatGPT-4 in Japanese. In the survey, 6 main question items were used to evaluate the quality of the generated clinical vignettes and their educational utility, which are information quality, information accuracy, educational usefulness, clinical match, terminology accuracy (TA), and diagnosis difficulty. Feedback was solicited from physicians specializing in general internal medicine or general medicine and experienced in medical education. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to identify differences among cases, and linear regression was used to examine trends associated with physicians' experience. Thematic analysis of qualitative feedback was performed to identify areas for improvement and confirm the educational utility of the cases.
resultsOf the 73 invited participants, 71 (97%) responded. The respondents, primarily male (64/71, 90%), spanned a broad range of practice years (from 1976 to 2017) and represented diverse hospital sizes throughout Japan. The majority deemed the information quality (mean 0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.79) and information accuracy (mean 0.68, 95% CI 0.65-0.71) to be satisfactory, with these responses being based on binary data. The average scores assigned were 3.55 (95% CI 3.49-3.60) for educational usefulness, 3.70 (95% CI 3.65-3.75) for clinical match, 3.49 (95% CI 3.44-3.55) for TA, and 2.34 (95% CI 2.28-2.40) for diagnosis difficulty, based on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis showed significant variability in content quality and relevance across the cases (P<.001 after Bonferroni correction). Participants suggested improvements in generating physical findings, using natural language, and enhancing medical TA. The thematic analysis highlighted the need for clearer documentation, clinical information consistency, content relevance, and patient-centered case presentations.
conclusionsChatGPT-4-generated medical cases written in Japanese possess considerable potential as resources in medical education, with recognized adequacy in quality and accuracy. Nevertheless, there is a notable need for enhancements in the precision and realism of case details. This study emphasizes ChatGPT-4's value as an adjunctive educational tool in the medical field, requiring expert oversight for optimal application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.