Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136989›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Persistent species relationships characterize migrating bird communities across stopover sites and seasons.

Joely G DeSimone, Lucas W DeGroote, Stuart A MacKenzie, Jennifer C Owen, Andrea J Patterson, Emily B Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Persistent species relationships characterize migrating bird communities across stopover sites and seasons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joely G DeSimoneAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD 21532.ORCID 0000-0002-7486-6443
Lucas W DeGrooteAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD 21532.ORCID 0000-0002-9759-3679
Stuart A MacKenzieLong Point Bird Observatory, Birds Canada, Port Rowan, ON N0E 1M0, Canada.
Jennifer C OwenDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.ORCID 0000-0003-1383-4816
Andrea J PattersonBraddock Bay Bird Observatory, Hilton, NY 14468.ORCID 0009-0001-2870-7476
Emily B CohenAppalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD 21532.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-4278

Funding

NSF (NSF) #2146052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global migrations of diverse animal species often converge along the same routes, bringing together seasonal assemblages of animals that may compete, prey on each other, and share information or pathogens. These interspecific interactions, when energetic demands are high and the time to complete journeys is short, may influence survival, migratory success, stopover ecology, and migratory routes. Numerous accounts suggest that interspecific co-migrations are globally distributed in aerial, aquatic, and terrestrial systems, although the study of migration to date has rarely investigated species interactions among migrating animals. Here, we test the hypothesis that migrating animals are communities engaged in networks of ecological interactions. We leverage over half a million records of 50 bird species from five bird banding sites collected over 8 to 23 y to test for species associations using social network analyses. We find strong support for persistent species relationships across sites and between spring and fall migration. These relationships may be ecologically meaningful: They are often stronger among phylogenetically related species with similar foraging behaviors and nonbreeding ranges even after accounting for the nonsocial contributions to associations, including overlap in migration timing and habitat use. While interspecific interactions could result in costly competition or beneficial information exchange, we find that relationships are largely positive, suggesting limited competitive exclusion at the scale of a banding station during migratory stopovers. Our findings support an understanding of animal migrations that consist of networked communities rather than random assemblages of independently migrating species, encouraging future studies of the nature and consequences of co-migrant interactions.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationBirdsEcosystemSeasonsAnimalsbird bandingcommunity ecologymigrationsocial network analysisspecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID39136989
PMCPMC11348330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.