Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136984›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Range expansions across landscapes with quenched noise.

Jimmy Gonzalez Nuñez, Jayson Paulose, Wolfram Möbius, Daniel A Beller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Range expansions across landscapes with quenched noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jimmy Gonzalez NuñezDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Jayson PauloseDepartment of Physics, Institute for Fundamental Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-9817
Wolfram MöbiusLiving Systems Institute, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QH, United Kingdom.
Daniel A BellerDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.ORCID 0000-0003-1957-164X

Funding

Hellman Family Foundation N/ANSF | Directorate for STEM Education (EDU) DGE-163372NSF | EDU | Division of Equity for Excellence in STEM (EES) HRD-1547848UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/V011464/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When biological populations expand into new territory, the evolutionary outcomes can be strongly influenced by genetic drift, the random fluctuations in allele frequencies. Meanwhile, spatial variability in the environment can also significantly influence the competition between subpopulations vying for space. Little is known about the interplay of these intrinsic and extrinsic sources of noise in population dynamics: When does environmental heterogeneity dominate over genetic drift or vice versa, and what distinguishes their population genetics signatures? Here, in the context of neutral evolution, we examine the interplay between a population's intrinsic, demographic noise and an extrinsic, quenched random noise provided by a heterogeneous environment. Using a multispecies Eden model, we simulate a population expanding over a landscape with random variations in local growth rates and measure how this variability affects genealogical tree structure, and thus genetic diversity. We find that, for strong heterogeneity, the genetic makeup of the expansion front is to a great extent predetermined by the set of fastest paths through the environment. The landscape-dependent statistics of these optimal paths then supersede those of the population's intrinsic noise as the main determinant of evolutionary dynamics. Remarkably, the statistics for coalescence of genealogical lineages, derived from those deterministic paths, strongly resemble the statistics emerging from demographic noise alone in uniform landscapes. This cautions interpretations of coalescence statistics and raises new challenges for inferring past population dynamics.

Indexed as

Population DynamicsBiological EvolutionGene FrequencyGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHumansModels, Geneticheterogeneous environmentneutral evolutionpopulation geneticsrange expansion

Identifiers

PMID39136984
PMCPMC11348022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.