ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2025
A pilot study of perfusion balloon predilatation in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration for acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ischemic time is associated with procedure-related no-reflow/slow-flow during perfusion balloon-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Article
- CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in 2026.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Standard and Non-standard Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Ischemic Heart Disease and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Clinical Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Sub-analysis of perfusion balloon predilatation with intracoronary nicorandil vs. distal protection for acute coronary syndrome: A comparative evaluation.Fujita medical journal · 2026Article
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Cardiovascular Care.Circulation reports · 2025Review
- Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Clinical Review.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Review
- The First-in-Man Technique of Drug Eluting and Perfusion Therapy for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Successful resolution of ST-segment elevation by intracoronary nicorandil administration during perfusion balloon inflation.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine injections for no-reflow or slow flow in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Slow-flow or no-reflow phenomenon is a common procedural complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given the presence of fragile plaque or thrombotic materials, we hypothesized that long-time predilatation using a perfusion balloon in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration reduces the risk of slow-flow or no-reflow in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Subjects were patients presenting with ACS who underwent PCI between April 2020 and April 2022. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of slow-flow or no-reflow during the procedure as well as in-hospital outcomes in comparison between the cases undergoing 3-min predilatation using a perfusion balloon in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration followed by DES implantation (PB group) and those with direct stenting (DS group). Among 439 ACS patients, 36 patients in the PB group and 51 patients in the DS group were examined. Mean age was 70 years and 78.2% was male. Distal protection devices were more frequently used in the DS group than in the PB group (31.3% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.02). The incidence rate of slow-flow or no-reflow was significantly lower in the PB group than in the DS group (2.8% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.01). Six cases (11.7%) in the DS group required intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP), while none in the PB group required (p < 0.01). In-hospital clinical outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Prolonged perfusion balloon predilatation in conjunction with intracoronary nicorandil administration was safe and feasible. This novel strategy could be an attractive alternative to conventional direct stenting for ACS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39136888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.