Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136862›Full record

Observational studyEuropean geriatric medicine2024

Post-COVID-19 recovery and geriatric rehabilitation care: a European inter-country comparative study.

Lisa S van Tol, Tiangao Lin, Monique A A Caljouw, Matteo Cesari, Frances Dockery, Irma H J Everink, Bahaa N Francis, Adam L Gordon, Stefan Grund, Luba Matchekhina and 6 more

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European geriatric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lisa S van TolDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. L.S.van_Tol@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-9214
Tiangao LinDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Monique A A CaljouwDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Matteo CesariIRCCS Istituti Clinici Maugeri, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Frances DockeryBeaumont Hospital & Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Irma H J EverinkDepartment of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bahaa N FrancisFliman Geriatric Rehabilitation Center, Haifa, Israel.
Adam L GordonAcademic Unit of Injury, Recovery and Inflammation Sciences (IRIS), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Stefan GrundCenter for Geriatric Medicine, Agaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg, Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Luba MatchekhinaRussian Gerontology Research and Clinical Centre, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
L Mónica Perez BazanRE-FiT Barcelona Research Group, Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Eva TopinkováDepartment of Geriatrics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Faculty Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Mark A VassalloKarin Grech Hospital, Pieta, Malta.
Wilco P AchterbergDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Miriam L HaaksmaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
EU-COGER consortium

Funding

Leiden University Fund (Leiden Empowerment Fund) LEF2106-2-47ZonMw 10430102110005ZonMw 640001003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is variation in organization of geriatric rehabilitation across Europe. The purpose of this study was to describe the selection criteria for referral to geriatric rehabilitation, care provided, and recovery trajectories of post-COVID-19 patients referred to geriatric rehabilitation in Europe.

methodsThis observational cohort study included 723 patients in 59 care facilities for geriatric rehabilitation across 10 countries. Patient data were collected from medical records on admission to geriatric rehabilitation (between September 2020 and October 2021), discharge, 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were recovery in daily functioning (Barthel Index) and Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) from admission to discharge. These were examined using linear mixed models with two levels (measurements nested in patients) and country as an independent variable. Random intercept and random linear slope parameters were added when they improved model fit. A survey about organization of geriatric rehabilitation for post-COVID-19 patients was filled out by country coordinators and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inductive coding of answers to open questions.

resultsPatients had a mean age of 75.7 years old and 52.4% were male. Many countries used various combinations of the selection criteria, such as functional status, age, frailty, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, comorbidities, and cognitive impairments. Most patients received physiotherapy (88.8%) and occupational therapy (69.7%), but there was substantial variance between countries in the percentages of patients that received protein or calorie enriched diets, oxygen therapy, and other treatment components. In all countries, patients showed recovery in daily functioning and quality of life, although there was variation in between countries in rate of recovery. Daily functioning seemed to increase most rapidly in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Russia. The steepest increases in quality of life were seen in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Spain.

conclusionPost-COVID-19 patients showed recovery during geriatric rehabilitation, albeit at variable rates. The observed variation may be explained by the heterogeneity in selection criteria and care provided. This study highlights the need for harmonization of measurements in geriatric rehabilitation order to perform explanatory research and optimize geriatric rehabilitation throughout Europe to ensure optimal patient recovery.

Indexed as

COVID-19Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionSARS-CoV-2COVID-19EuropeGeriatric rehabilitationRecovery

Identifiers

PMID39136862
PMCPMC11614975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.