Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136851›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

The Influence of Nutrition Intervention on the P1NP and CTX-1 Response to an Acute Exercise Bout: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Eimear Dolan, Alina Dumas, Gabriel Perri Esteves, Leticia Lopes Takarabe, Luisa Alves Mendonça Perfeito, Karen M Keane, Bruno Gualano, George A Kelley, Louise Burke, Craig Sale and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eimear DolanApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport and Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. eimeardol@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-7601
Alina DumasApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport and Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel Perri EstevesApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport and Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Leticia Lopes TakarabeApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport and Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Luisa Alves Mendonça PerfeitoApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport and Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Karen M KeaneDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, School of Science and Computing, Atlantic Technological University, Galway, Ireland.
Bruno GualanoApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport and Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
George A KelleySchool of Public and Population Health and Department of Kinesiology, Boise State University, Boise, USA.
Louise BurkeMary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Craig SaleDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Institute of Sport, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Paul A SwintonSchool of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/05616-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/26899-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/07860-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/09028-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough nutrition and exercise both influence bone metabolism, little is currently known about their interaction, or whether nutritional intervention can modulate the bone biomarker response to acute exercise. Improved understanding of the relationships between nutrition, exercise and bone metabolism may have substantial potential to inform nutritional interventions to protect the bone health of exercising individuals, and to elucidate mechanisms by which exercise and nutrition influence bone.

objectiveThe aim was to synthesise available evidence related to the influence of nutrition on the response of the bone biomarkers procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX-1) to acute exercise, using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach.

methodsStudies evaluating the influence of nutritional status or intervention on the bone biomarker response to an acute exercise bout were included and separated into four categories: (1) feeding status and energy availability, (2) macronutrients, (3) micronutrients and (4) other. Studies conducted on healthy human populations of any age or training status were included. Meta-analysis was conducted when data from at least five studies with independent datasets were available. In the case of insufficient data to warrant meta-analysis, results from individual studies were narratively synthesised and standardised mean effect sizes visually represented.

resultsTwenty-two articles were included. Of these, three investigated feeding status or energy availability, eight macronutrients, eight micronutrients (all calcium) and six other interventions including dairy products or collagen supplementation. Three studies had more than one intervention and were included in all relevant outcomes. The largest and most commonly reported effects were for the bone resorption marker CTX-1. Meta-analysis indicated that calcium intake, whether provided via supplements, diet or infusion, reduced exercise-induced increases in CTX-1 (effect size - 1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI] -  2.2 to - 0.05), with substantially larger effects observed in studies that delivered calcium via direct infusion versus in supplements or foods. Narrative synthesis suggests that carbohydrate supplementation may support bone during acute exercise, via reducing exercise-induced increases in CTX-1. Conversely, a low-carbohydrate/high-fat diet appears to induce the opposite effect, as evidenced by an increased exercise associated CTX-1 response, and reduced P1NP response. Low energy availability may amplify the CTX-1 response to exercise, but it is unclear whether this is directly attributable to energy availability or to the lack of specific nutrients, such as carbohydrate.

conclusionNutritional intervention can modulate the acute bone biomarker response to exercise, which primarily manifests as an increase in bone resorption. Ensuring adequate attention to nutritional factors may be important to protect bone health of exercising individuals, with energy, carbohydrate and calcium availability particularly important to consider. Although a wide breadth of data were available for this evidence synthesis, there was substantial heterogeneity in relation to design and intervention characteristics. Direct and indirect replication is required to confirm key findings and to generate better estimates of true effect sizes.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCollagen Type IExerciseNutritional StatusPeptide FragmentsProcollagenBone and BonesEnergy IntakeHumansMicronutrientsPeptidesBiomarkersCollagen Type Icollagen type I trimeric cross-linked peptideMicronutrientsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesProcollagenprocollagen Type I N-terminal peptide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.