Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136793›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2024

How does the life cycle of Clinodiplosis profusa (Cecidomyiidae) adjust to phenological variations of the host plant Eugenia uniflora (Myrtaceae) in sun and shade?

Rayssa Rosa Marquesine, Pedro Henrique Pereira Gonçalves, Leticia Ponticel Nobrega, Dulce Mantuano, Bruno Garcia Ferreira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rayssa Rosa MarquesineUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Botânica, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0885-9108
Pedro Henrique Pereira GonçalvesUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia, Instituto de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Ecologia, Conservação E Biodiversidade, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-4233
Leticia Ponticel NobregaUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Botânica, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6219-8601
Dulce MantuanoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Botânica, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8049-6936
Bruno Garcia FerreiraUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Botânica, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. bgf@biologia.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-2988

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 141089/2022-09Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 310520/2023-1Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 211.255/2019Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/211.608/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Galls are plant neoformations induced by specialized parasites. Since gall inducers rely on reactive plant sites for gall development, variations in abiotic factors that affect plant phenology are expected to impact the life cycle of gall inducers. To test the hypothesis that different light conditions affect both host plant and gall inducer life cycles, we studied the system Eugenia uniflora (Myrtaceae) - Clinodiplosis profusa (Cecidomyiidae), comparing plants occurring in sunny and shaded environments. We mapped phenological differences among individuals of E. uniflora occurring in the two environments and related them to the influence of luminosity on the life cycle of the gall inducer. Shade plants showed lower intensity of leaf sprouting throughout the year compared to sun-exposed plants, especially during the rainy season. Young and mature galls are synchronized with the peak of leaf sprouting at the beginning of the rainy season, lasting longer in sun-exposed plants - approximately two months longer compared to shade plants. The greater light intensity positively impacts the formation and growth of leaves and galls, with an extended period available for their induction and growth. Thus, light is an important factor for the development of gallers, considering that variations in luminosity influenced not only the phenology of the host plant, but also determined the life cycle of gall inducers. Furthermore, changes in plant-environment interactions are expected to affect the life cycle and richness of other host plant-gall inducer systems.

Indexed as

EugeniaSunlightAnimalsHost-Parasite InteractionsLife Cycle StagesLightPlant LeavesPlant TumorsSeasonsInsect-plant interactionLeaf gallsLuminosityPhenological synchrony

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.