Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136776›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2024

Clozapine-associated adverse drug reactions in 38,349 psychiatric inpatients: drug surveillance data from the AMSP project between 1993 and 2016.

Lene Bleich, Renate Grohmann, Waldemar Greil, Dominik Dabbert, Andreas Erfurth, Sermin Toto, Johanna Seifert

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bipolar disorder in oncology: Considerations for the psychiatrist.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Clozapine-induced Myocarditis in Korea: Analysis of a Nationwide Database and Comparison to Other Countries.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lene BleichDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany. lene.bleich@stud.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0009-0007-9585-4744
Renate GrohmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Waldemar GreilDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, 80336, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-735X
Dominik DabbertDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinik Bremen-Ost, 28325, Bremen, Germany.
Andreas Erfurth1st Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Klinik Hietzing, 1130, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3870-3521
Sermin TotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8859-6907
Johanna SeifertDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8678-7419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clozapine is a second-generation antipsychotic drug that offers superior treatment results in patients with schizophrenia but is also associated with significant risks. This study analyzes data on pharmacotherapy with clozapine and the associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in an inpatient setting including 38,349 patients. Data about the use of clozapine and reports of severe ADRs within the period 1993-2016 were obtained from the multicentered observational pharmacovigilance program "Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie" (AMSP). In total, 586 severe clozapine-associated ADRs were documented (1.53% of all patients exposed). Patients aged ≥65 years had a higher risk of ADRs than patients aged <65 years (1.96 vs. 1.48%; p = 0.021). Significantly more ADRs were attributed to clozapine alone (396; 67.6% of all 586 ADRs) than to a combination with other drugs. The most frequent ADRs were grand mal seizures (0.183% of all 38,349 patients exposed), delirium (0.180%), increased liver enzymes (0.120%), and agranulocytosis (0.107%). We detected 24 cases (0.063%) of clozapine-induced extrapyramidal symptoms, of which 8 (0.021%) were attributed to clozapine alone. Five ADRs resulted in death (0.013%): 2 due to agranulocytosis (41 cases total) (mortality = 4.88%) and 3 due to paralytic (sub)ileus (16 cases) (mortality = 18.75%). The median dose of clozapine in all patients treated was 300 mg/day, in patients who developed ADRs 250 mg/day. The main risk factor for an ADR was pre-existing damage of the affected organ system. Overall, the results of this study highlight the importance of alertness-especially of frequently overlooked symptoms-and appropriate monitoring during treatment with clozapine, even at low doses.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineAdolescentAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPharmacovigilanceYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineAdverse drug reactionAMSP programClozapineDrug safetyPharmacovigilancePsychiatric inpatients

Identifiers

PMID39136776
PMCPMC11365862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.