ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Fitting parameters in children with cochlear implants and severe additional disabilities.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate whether the fitting data of children with Cochlear implants (CI) and severe additional disabilities (CAD) differ compared to children with CI but without additional disabilities (CnonAD).
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, 76 CI cases (fitted ears) from CAD were included and matched with 76 cases from CnonAD. The subjective set values, such as pulse width (PW), threshold (T) and most comfortable (MC) levels were recorded. Additionally, the response threshold values by means of aided soundfield threshold (AST), the values of the intracochlear electrode impedances, the eCAP thresholds and the daily wearing time by using data logging were recorded and analysed.
resultsThe T and MC levels for the Medel implants were significantly lower in the sample than in the control group. A similar trend was evident for Cochlear
conclusionsThe significantly higher eCAPs in CAD may be explained by different neural survival but also by different fittings and MC levels. The audiuologist's subjectivity must be considered as a potential bias but also as potentially valuable input variable contributing to the variance in the fitting parameters and outcomes. Better fitting of T and MC levels focusing on behavioural and developmental responses may lead to a longer wearing time. To support the audiologist and the fitting process, it is necessary to interpret the response thresholds in the aided soundfield threshold against the background of the medical diagnosis and observations from everyday life should be considered. To ensure optimal development of CAD children according to their individual abilities, a multi-professional, family-centred intervention programme including videoanalyses should be implemented at an early stage, ideally from the decision process for a cochlear implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39136774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.