ArticleSurgery today2025
Prognostic impact of combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S-1 and subsequent conversion surgery for initially unresectable upper biliary tract cancers.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC): A Chinese Physician Survey.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Survival Outcomes of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin-S-1 Versus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study With a Focus on Conversion Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin versus S-1 plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: a comparative study.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Conversion Surgery after Complete Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Sequential Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE AND
backgroundFor the past decade, there have been few chemotherapy options for unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC). Recently, however, combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S-1 (GCS) has been identified as a promising strategy. This retrospective study analyzes the clinical results of GCS therapy and subsequent conversion surgery (CS).
methodWe analyzed the clinical data of 60 consecutive patients who received GCS therapy for unresectable upper BTC at our university hospital during the 5 years between September, 2018 and December, 2022.
resultsAll patients received GCS therapy as first-line chemotherapy. The response rate was 33.9% and subsequent CS was performed in 35.0%. Of the patients who underwent CS, 81% required more than bisectionectomy of the liver with extrahepatic bile duct resection. The median overall survival of the patients who received GCS therapy and underwent subsequent CS was significantly longer than that of the patients who received GCS therapy alone (28.0 months vs. 12.4 months, respectively; p < 0.001). A decrease in the CA19-9 level 1 month after chemotherapy and RECIST PR were independent positive predictors of CS, whereas unresectable gallbladder cancer and pretreatment ALBI grade 3 were negative predictors of CS.
conclusionGCS therapy and subsequent CS may contribute to the longer term survival of patients with unresectable upper BTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39136750What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.