Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136705›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2025

ESR Essentials: response assessment criteria in oncologic imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.

Giulia A Zamboni, Giovanni Cappello, Damiano Caruso, Sofia Gourtsoyianni, Clemens Cyran, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Melvin D'Anastasi, Laure Fournier, Emanuele Neri

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Improved early response assessment of chemoimmunotherapy efficacy byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giulia A ZamboniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Radiology, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, P.Le LA Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. giulia.zamboni@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5059-3305
Giovanni CappelloRadiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Str. Prov.le 142 km 3.95, 10060, Candiolo (Turin), Italy.
Damiano CarusoDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via Di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Sofia Gourtsoyianni1st Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Areteion Hospital, 76, Vas. Sophias Ave., 11528, Athens, Greece.
Clemens CyranDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Melvin D'AnastasiMedical Imaging Department, Mater Dei Hospital, University of Malta, Msida, 2090, MSD, Malta.
Laure FournierUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Radiology, PARCC UMRS 970, INSERM, Paris, France.
Emanuele NeriDepartment of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the response to oncological treatments is paramount for determining the prognosis and defining the best treatment for each patient. Several biomarkers, including imaging, can be used, but standardization is fundamental for consistency and reliability. Tumor response evaluation criteria have been defined by international groups for application in pharmaceutical clinical trials evaluating new drugs or therapeutic strategies. RECIST 1.1 criteria are exclusively based on unidimensional lesion measurements; changes in tumor size are used as surrogate imaging biomarkers to correlate with patient outcomes. However, increased tumor size does not always reflect tumor progression. The introduction of immunotherapy has led to the development of new criteria (iRECIST, Level of Evidence (LoE) Ib) that consider the possibility that an increase in disease burden is secondary to the immune response instead of progression, with the new concept of Unconfirmed Progressive Disease (a first progression event which must be confirmed on follow-up). Specific criteria were devised for HCC (mRECIST, LoE IV), which measure only enhancing HCC portions to account for changes after local therapy. For GIST treated with imatinib, criteria were developed to account for the possible increase in size reflecting a response rather than a progression by assessing both tumor size and density on CT (Choi, LoE II). This article provides concise and relevant practice recommendations aimed at general radiologists to help choose and apply the most appropriate criteria for assessing response to treatment in different oncologic scenarios. Though these criteria were developed for clinical trials, they may be applied in clinical practice as a guide for day-to-day interpretation. KEY POINTS: Response evaluation criteria, designed for use in clinical trials, might serve as a surrogate biomarker for overall survival. RECIST 1.1 defines measurable and non-measurable disease among which target lesions and non-target lesions are selected at baseline as reference for follow-ups. Some therapies and/or cancers require the use of different criteria, such as iRECIST, mRECIST, and Choi criteria.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingMedical OncologyNeoplasmsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsDisease ProgressionEuropeHumansSocieties, MedicalBiomarkersNeoplasm metastasisNeoplasmsResponse evaluation criteria in solid tumorsTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID39136705
PMCPMC11782350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.