Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136620›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2024

Memory compromise at extended delays in people with new-onset epilepsy.

Remy Pugh, David N Vaughan, Graeme D Jackson, Jennie Ponsford, Chris Tailby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Remy PughSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6299-0381
David N VaughanFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6225-7739
Graeme D JacksonFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7917-5326
Jennie PonsfordSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-125X
Chris TailbySchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMemory is one of the most sensitive markers of cognitive compromise in people with new-onset epilepsy. Nonetheless, around half of these cases score within the normal range on standard memory testing. Here we explore whether memory retention at a 1-week delay reveals otherwise undetected memory compromise in such individuals, and how it relates to subjective memory complaints and mood.

methodsUsing a prospective design, 38 adults with new-onset epilepsy underwent baseline memory screening via telephone using an abbreviated Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Psychological screening occurred via online questionnaires. One week later, without forewarning, participants completed three follow-up memory tasks. Of particular focus, we explored longer-term memory performances and forgetting trajectories in those individuals (n = 23) who demonstrated normal memory performances (scores >10th percentile) at baseline (30-min delay). Outcomes were compared to 32 healthy controls, matched for age, sex, and education.

resultsAs a group, people with epilepsy performed worse than controls on all memory measures, with 44 percent impaired at baseline testing. Of those unimpaired at baseline, the rate and volume of information loss over 1 week was significantly greater than for controls. Contextual memory performance at 1 week was also significantly poorer for people with epilepsy. At the individual level, the prevalence of impaired forgetting was not significantly different between patients and controls. Subjective memory complaints were not related to any objective tests but were strongly related to self-reported mood and anxiety symptoms. SIGNIFICANCE: People with new-onset epilepsy show reduced memory at short and extended intervals. For those showing normal memory at baseline, information does appear to be forgotten more quickly than in healthy controls, though the effect is not large. The findings indicate that while extended delay memory testing is not essential in all new epilepsy cases, it could provide useful information for particular individuals. PLAIN LANGUAGE STATEMENT: Memory problems are common in people with epilepsy shortly after seizure onset, however, many individuals still show normal memory performances on standard neuropsychological testing. Through testing memory at an extended timepoint (1 week), our study found that on average, these individuals showed a slightly quicker rate of forgetting over a 1-week period than people without a brain condition. Self-reported memory complaints in people with new epilepsy were unrelated to their actual memory skills on testing at short and long timepoints but were rather linked to lower mood and quality of life.

Indexed as

EpilepsyMemory DisordersNeuropsychological TestsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultALFcognitionepilepsymemorytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID39136620
PMCPMC11450601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.