ArticleAnnals of botany2024
Co-flowering richness has variable effects on pollen quantity and quality limitation in four Clarkia species.
Article in Annals of botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fire-stimulated flowering enhances multiple plant fitness components.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Contrasting effects of pollinators on the pollination success of floral morphs of a distylous bowl-shaped flower.Annals of botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPollination failure occurs from insufficient pollen quantity or quality. However, the relative contributions of pollen quantity vs. quality to overall pollen limitation, and how this is affected by the co-flowering context, remain unknown for most plant populations. Here, we studied patterns of pollen deposition and pollen tube formation across populations of four predominately outcrossing species in the genus Clarkia to evaluate how the richness of co-flowering congeners affects the contribution of pollen quantity and quality to pollen limitation.
methodsWe partition variation in pollen deposition and pollen tube production across individuals, populations and species to identify the main sources of variation in components of reproductive success. We further quantify the relative contribution of pollen quantity and quality limitation to the reproductive success of the four Clarkia species using piecewise regression analyses. Finally, we evaluate how variation in the number of co-flowering Clarkia species in the community affects the strength of pollen quality and quality limitation.
resultsAcross all contexts, pollen deposition and the proportion of pollen tubes produced varied greatly among individuals, populations and species, and these were not always correlated. For instance, C. xantiana received the smallest pollen loads yet produced the highest proportion of pollen tubes, while C. speciosa exhibited the opposite pattern. Yet, co-flowering richness had variable effects on the strength of pollen quantity and quality limitation among populations. Specifically, breakpoint values, which are an indicator of overall pollen limitation, were two-fold higher in the four-species community compared with one- and two-species communities for two Clarkia species, suggesting that pollen limitation can increase with increasing richness of co-flowering congeners.
conclusionsOur results reveal a complex interplay between the quantity and quality of pollen limitation and co-flowering context that may have different evolutionary outcomes across species and populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.