Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136157›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Systems thinking in, and for, public health: a call for a broader path.

Erica Wirrmann Gadsby, Helen Wilding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Integrating Systems and Critical Thinking, Clinical Reasoning, Decision-Making, and Judgement in Dietetic Education: Development of a Conceptual Pilot Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Using Collective Impact for intersectoral action in rural Northern Ontario: Two case studies.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Systems Science in Nutrition and Dietetics Research: A Practical Lens for Applying Systems Approaches in Research.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Empowerment, Participation, and Person-Centeredness as Prerequisites for Health-Promoting Settings in Everyday Practice: A Swedish Case Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  10. Dietitians as System Builders: Advancing Equity, Sustainability and Health in Community Nutrition and Primary Care.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Using Expert Elicitation and Systems Mapping to Support Social Innovation in the (Blue) Food System: The Case of the UK's Plymouth Fish Finger.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Goals in Nutrition Science 2025-2030.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Integrating Systems Thinking and Behavioural Science.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erica Wirrmann GadsbyFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-5911
Helen WildingApplied Systems Thinking in Practice group, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems thinking has been recognized as valuable to public health policy, research and practice. Commentators and reviews have highlighted that there is still much to be done to embrace its potential. Here, we highlight that much of the discourse about systems thinking in, and for, public health supports the pursuit of a narrow path and is limited with respect to the lineages of Systems that are embraced. We invite readers to see the potential of systems thinking in pursuing a broader path which is motivated by a concern for alleviating health inequalities. This does not replace the narrow path but encompasses it. It prompts different considerations with respect to the nature of the transformation, partnership working and legitimacy. It also invites a different way of engaging with systems thinking and different ways of conceptualizing and managing change. The broad path both requires, and helps enhance, new ways of doing, relating, organizing, knowing and framing which are vital for the future of public health as a global concern.

Indexed as

Public HealthSystems AnalysisHealth PolicyHumansempowermentinequalitiespartnershipsystemicsystemstransformation

Identifiers

PMID39136157
PMCPMC11319874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.