Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136092›Full record

SynthesisJournal of athletic training2025

Gait-Training Interventions for Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Christine E Ortega, Danielle M Torp, Luke Donovan, Jeffrey D Simpson, Lauren Forsyth, Rachel M Koldenhoven

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of athletic training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine E OrtegaDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos.
Danielle M TorpDepartment of Athletic Training and Clinical Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Luke DonovanDepartment of Applied Physiology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Jeffrey D SimpsonDepartment of Movement Sciences and Health, University of Western Florida, Pensacola.
Lauren ForsythDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Rachel M KoldenhovenDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic ankle instability (CAI) is a condition known to negatively affect lower extremity gait biomechanics during walking. Gait-training interventions have been proposed as a potential strategy to improve faulty movement patterns associated with CAI.

objectiveTo determine if gait-training interventions influence lower extremity biomechanics during walking in individuals with CAI.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE from database inception through September 15, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were published in English and included randomized controlled trials, studies with a repeated-measures design, and descriptive laboratory studies in which authors measured the biomechanical outcomes (kinematics, kinetics, and electromyography) of a gait-training intervention during walking in individuals with CAI. DATA EXTRACTION: One author extracted study design, participant characteristics, sample size, intervention type (device and biofeedback), intervention length, and biomechanical outcome measures (kinematics, kinetics, and electromyography). DATA SYNTHESIS: Gait-training interventions were broadly categorized into device (destabilization and novel gait-training devices) and biofeedback (visual, auditory, and haptic delivery modes). When appropriate, meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to compare mean differences and SDs before and after the gait-training intervention.

resultsThirteen studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted only for single-session gait-training studies. Authors of 11 studies reported kinetic outcomes. Meta-analyses showed the location of center of pressure was shifted medially from 0% to 90% of stance (effect size [ES] range, -0.35 to -0.82), contact time was decreased in the medial forefoot (ES = -0.43), peak pressure was decreased for the lateral midfoot (ES = -1.18) and increased for the hallux (ES = 0.59), and the pressure time integral was decreased for the lateral heel (ES = -0.33) and the lateral midfoot (ES = -1.22) and increased for the hallux (ES = 0.63). Authors of 3 studies reported kinematic outcomes. Authors of 7 studies reported electromyography outcomes. Meta-analyses revealed increased activity for 200 milliseconds after initial contact for the fibularis longus muscle (ES = 0.83).

conclusionsGait-training protocols improved some lower extremity biomechanical outcomes in individuals with CAI. Plantar-pressure outcome measures seemed to be most affected by gait-training programs, with improvements including decreasing the lateral pressure associated with increased risk for lateral ankle sprains. Gait training increased electromyographic activity after initial contact for the fibularis longus muscle. Authors of few studies have assessed the effect of multisession gait training on biomechanical outcome measures. Targeted gait training should be considered when treating patients with CAI.

Indexed as

Ankle JointExercise TherapyGaitJoint InstabilityBiofeedback, PsychologyBiomechanical PhenomenaChronic DiseaseElectromyographyHumansWalkingankle sprainbiofeedbackbiomechanicsgait-training devicerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39136092
PMCPMC12127904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.