SynthesisJournal of athletic training2025
Gait-Training Interventions for Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of athletic training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multisegmented Foot and Lower Limb Kinematics During Gait in Males with Chronic Ankle Instability: Exploring Links with Hip Abductor Strength.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring Musical Feedback for Gait Retraining: A Novel Approach to Orthopedic Rehabilitation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rebuilding Stability: Exploring the Best Rehabilitation Methods for Chronic Ankle Instability.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic ankle instability (CAI) is a condition known to negatively affect lower extremity gait biomechanics during walking. Gait-training interventions have been proposed as a potential strategy to improve faulty movement patterns associated with CAI.
objectiveTo determine if gait-training interventions influence lower extremity biomechanics during walking in individuals with CAI.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE from database inception through September 15, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies were published in English and included randomized controlled trials, studies with a repeated-measures design, and descriptive laboratory studies in which authors measured the biomechanical outcomes (kinematics, kinetics, and electromyography) of a gait-training intervention during walking in individuals with CAI. DATA EXTRACTION: One author extracted study design, participant characteristics, sample size, intervention type (device and biofeedback), intervention length, and biomechanical outcome measures (kinematics, kinetics, and electromyography). DATA SYNTHESIS: Gait-training interventions were broadly categorized into device (destabilization and novel gait-training devices) and biofeedback (visual, auditory, and haptic delivery modes). When appropriate, meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to compare mean differences and SDs before and after the gait-training intervention.
resultsThirteen studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted only for single-session gait-training studies. Authors of 11 studies reported kinetic outcomes. Meta-analyses showed the location of center of pressure was shifted medially from 0% to 90% of stance (effect size [ES] range, -0.35 to -0.82), contact time was decreased in the medial forefoot (ES = -0.43), peak pressure was decreased for the lateral midfoot (ES = -1.18) and increased for the hallux (ES = 0.59), and the pressure time integral was decreased for the lateral heel (ES = -0.33) and the lateral midfoot (ES = -1.22) and increased for the hallux (ES = 0.63). Authors of 3 studies reported kinematic outcomes. Authors of 7 studies reported electromyography outcomes. Meta-analyses revealed increased activity for 200 milliseconds after initial contact for the fibularis longus muscle (ES = 0.83).
conclusionsGait-training protocols improved some lower extremity biomechanical outcomes in individuals with CAI. Plantar-pressure outcome measures seemed to be most affected by gait-training programs, with improvements including decreasing the lateral pressure associated with increased risk for lateral ankle sprains. Gait training increased electromyographic activity after initial contact for the fibularis longus muscle. Authors of few studies have assessed the effect of multisession gait training on biomechanical outcome measures. Targeted gait training should be considered when treating patients with CAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.