ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Development and validation of a predictive model assessing the risk of sarcopenia in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk prediction model performances for sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- The risk prediction models for sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a sarcopenia identification model for older adults with multimorbidity in Xinjiang communities, Northwest China: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics, lifestyle, and autoimmune thyroiditis: an integrated association study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research on sarcopenia in rheumatoid arthritis: 1997-2025.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a Four-Year predictive model for sarcopenia in older adults: insights from the CHARLS cohort.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- A nomogram to predict sarcopenia in older adults: a multi-center study in rural China.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for unplanned 7-day readmission to PICU.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sarcopenia in Rheumatic Diseases: A Hidden Issue of Concern.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Role of IL-16 in age-related skeletal muscle atrophy: an integrated study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Observational
- Association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) and sarcopenia in individuals with arthritis: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Sarcopenia in Chinese Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcopenia is linked to an unfavorable prognosis in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Early identification and treatment of sarcopenia are clinically significant. This study aimed to create and validate a nomogram for predicting sarcopenia risk in RA patients, providing clinicians with a reliable tool for the early identification of high-risk patients. Methods: Patients with RA diagnosed between August 2022 and January 2024 were included and randomized into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis and multifactorial logistic regression analysis were used to screen the risk variables for RA-associated muscle loss and to create an RA sarcopenia risk score. The predictive performance and clinical utility of the risk model were evaluated by plotting the receiver operating characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC), along with the calibration curve and clinical decision curve (DCA). Results: A total of 480 patients with RA were included in the study (90% female, with the largest number in the 45-59 age group, about 50%). In this study, four variables (body mass index, disease duration, hemoglobin, and grip strength) were included to construct a nomogram for predicting RA sarcopenia. The training and validation set AUCs were 0.915 (95% CI: 0.8795-0.9498) and 0.907 (95% CI: 0.8552-0.9597), respectively, proving that the predictive model was well discriminated. The calibration curve showed that the predicted values of the model were basically in line with the actual values, demonstrating good calibration. The DCA indicated that almost the entire range of patients with RA can benefit from this novel prediction model, suggesting good clinical utility. Conclusion: This study developed and validated a nomogram prediction model to predict the risk of sarcopenia in RA patients. The model can assist clinicians in enhancing their ability to screen for RA sarcopenia, assess patient prognosis, make early decisions, and improve the quality of life for RA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.