Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39136012›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2024

Efgartigimod as a promising add-on therapy for myasthenic crisis: a prospective case series.

Jie Song, Haiyan Wang, Xiao Huan, Qilong Jiang, Zongtai Wu, Chong Yan, Jianying Xi, Chongbo Zhao, Huiyu Feng, Sushan Luo

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Heterogeneous response to efgartigimod in real-world experience with myasthenia gravis: Predictors and treatment strategies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. FcRn inhibitors for myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jie Song *Huashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haiyan Wang *Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao HuanHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qilong JiangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zongtai WuFaculty of Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chong YanHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianying XiHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chongbo ZhaoHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Huiyu FengDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sushan LuoHuashan Rare Disease Center and Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Efgartigimod is effective and well-tolerated in patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). However, the therapeutic potential and the safety profile of efgartigimod in myasthenic crisis (MC) remained largely unknown. Methods: This is an observational, prospective, multicenter, real-world study to follow 2 MC patients who initiated efgartigimod as a first-line rescue therapy and 8 cases who used it as an add-on therapy. Baseline demographic features and immunotherapies were collected, and the MG-activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scale was evaluated every week since efgartigimod treatment for 8 weeks. Additionally, serum IgG and anti-AChR antibody levels and the peripheral CD4 Results: Ten patients with MC were enrolled in the study, including 9 anti-AChR antibody positive and 1 anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) positive. All patients were successfully weaned from the ventilation after receiving efgartigimod treatment, with a length of 10.44 ± 4.30 days. After one cycle of infusions, the MG-ADL score reduced from 15.6 ± 4.4 at the baseline to 3.4 ± 2.2, while the corticosteroid dose was tapered from 55.0 ± 20.7 mg to 26.0 ± 14.1 mg. The proportions of regulatory T cells and naïve T cells (% in CD4 Conclusion: These findings validated the rapid action of efgartigimod in facilitating the weaning process with a good safety profile in patients with MC.

Indexed as

Myasthenia GravisAdultAgedAutoantibodiesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReceptors, CholinergicTreatment OutcomeAutoantibodiesReceptors, Cholinergicantibodyefgartigimodimmunoglobulin Gmyasthenic crisisrespiratory muscleventilation

Identifiers

PMID39136012
PMCPMC11317420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.