Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135998›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Tumor-informed ctDNA assessment as a valuable prognostic and predictive biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Mayur Narkhede, Sarah Tomassetti, Madiha Iqbal, Antony Tin, Samuel Rivero-Hinojosa, Giby V George, Hayley Widden, Ryan Benrud, Meenakshi Malhotra, Angel Rodriguez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. ctDNA MRD after CAR-T.Blood advances · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mayur NarkhedeDepartment of Hematology Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Sarah TomassettiDepartment of Medicine, Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center and The David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Madiha IqbalMayo Clinic, Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy [Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy (CAR-T)] Program, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Antony TinOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Samuel Rivero-HinojosaOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Giby V GeorgeOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Hayley WiddenOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Ryan BenrudOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Meenakshi MalhotraOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Angel RodriguezOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.
Minetta C LiuOncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A novel approach for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment monitoring is needed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to identify patients with a poor prognosis. We performed a retrospective evaluation of commercial ctDNA testing in patients with stage I-IV DLBCL to evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of tumor-informed ctDNA assessment. Methods: A personalized and tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay (Signatera™ bespoke mPCR NGS assay) was used for ctDNA detection and quantification. Results: In total, 50 patients (median age: 59 years; median follow-up: 12.68 months) were analyzed, of which 41 had pretreatment time points with ctDNA detected in 95% (39/41). Baseline ctDNA levels correlated with R-IPI scores and stage. ctDNA clearance during first-line therapy was predictive of improved therapy responses and outcomes (EFS, HR: 6.5, 95% CI: 1.9-22, p=0.003 and OS, HR: 22, 95% CI: 2.5-191, p=0.005). Furthermore, 48% (13/27) of patients cleared their ctDNA following the first cycle of treatment. Patients who cleared their ctDNA, irrespective of their R-IPI score, had superior outcomes compared to ctDNA-positive patients. ctDNA clearance outperformed other factors associated with EFS in multivariate analysis (HR: 49.76, 95% CI:1.1-2225.6, p=0.044). Finally, ctDNA clearance predicted complete response (CR)/no evidence of disease (NED) on average 97 days (range: 0-14.7 months) ahead of imaging/biopsy. Conclusion: ctDNA testing in patients with DLBCL is predictive of patient outcomes and may enable personalized surveillance, intervention, and/or trial options.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAmolecular residual diseasenext generation sequencingsurveillancetreatment response monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39135998
PMCPMC11317400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.