ArticleHRB open research2024
Fathers' experiences, views and perspectives of childbirth attendance: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol.
Article in HRB open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The involvement of husbands and male partners in childbirth no longer ceases at conception and pregnancy, rather fathers wish to be more involved in supporting their partners during childbirth. This aligns with the World Health Organization's (WHO) call for promoting male participation in childbirth, emphasising the benefits of support and the positive impact attending childbirth has for husbands/partners, and their maternal partner. This knowledge has led to global initiatives promoting "humanised" birth and a family-approach. To gain in-depth insight and understanding of childbirth attendance from the perspectives of fathers, a qualitative evidence synthesis is proposed. Methods: To explore fathers' experiences, views, and perspectives of childbirth attendance. All studies that used qualitative methodologies to explore the phenomenon of interest will be included. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar will be systematically searched from their dates of inception to present, supplemented by a search for grey literature and a search of the reference list of included studies. Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) will be used to ensure the comprehensiveness of the search strategy. Methodological quality assessment of included studies, using The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme assessment tool, and will be extracted from the included studies by two reviewers independently using a standard data extraction form. Thomas and Harden's three-stage approach will be used to thematically synthesise the data: coding of data, developing descriptive themes, and generation of analytical themes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual confidence in the synthesised findings Comprehensive insight and understanding of fathers' perspectives of childbirth attendance will be ascertained. PROSPERO Registration No: CRD42023470902.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.