ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Testing for Blastomycosis, Coccidioidomycosis, and Histoplasmosis at a Major Commercial Laboratory, United States, 2019-2024.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histoplasma antigen detection: A laboratory-based retrospective review of routine testing from 2021 to 2023.Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2026Article
- Mapping the Geographic Distribution of Dimorphic Mycoses Using a US Commercial Insurance Database.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Diagnosing Blastomycosis: A Review of Laboratory Methods and Clinical Utility.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and histoplasmosis are environmentally acquired fungal diseases that clinically resemble bacterial and viral community-acquired pneumonia and require laboratory testing for diagnosis. Patients frequently present to primary care and experience diagnostic delays when a fungal etiology is not initially suspected. Current national-level public health surveillance for these diseases is limited and does not include laboratory data, so nationwide testing practices are unknown. Methods: We identified laboratory tests for blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and histoplasmosis ordered during 1 March 2019-29 February 2024 and performed within a major national commercial laboratory system. We analyzed test results, patient and healthcare provider features, reasons for testing, and temporal trends. Results: Results included 5693 Conclusions: Blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and histoplasmosis are likely underdetected in primary care settings or by public health surveillance. Increased testing by primary care providers and expanded surveillance are needed to reduce disease burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.