Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135907›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oral health2024

Transforming Prosthodontics and oral implantology using robotics and artificial intelligence.

Atharva P Karnik, Harsita Chhajer, Swapna B Venkatesh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atharva P KarnikDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, India.
Harsita ChhajerDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, India.
Swapna B VenkateshDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current review focuses on how artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics can be applied to the field of Prosthodontics and oral implantology. The classification and methodologies of AI and application of AI and robotics in various aspects of Prosthodontics is summarized. The role of AI has potentially expanded in dentistry. It plays a vital role in data management, diagnosis, and treatment planning and administrative tasks. It has widespread applications in Prosthodontics owing to its immense diagnostic capability and possible therapeutic application. AI and robotics are next-generation technologies that are opening new avenues of growth and exploration for Prosthodontics. The current surge in digital human-centered automation has greatly benefited the dental field, as it transforms towards a new robotic, machine learning, and artificial intelligence era. The application of robotics and AI in the dental field aims to improve dependability, accuracy, precision, and efficiency by enabling the widespread adoption of cutting-edge dental technologies in future. Hence, the objective of the current review was to represent literature relevant to the applications of robotics and AI and in the context of diagnosis and clinical decision-making and predict successful treatment in Prosthodontics and oral implantology.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningrobotics

Identifiers

PMID39135907
PMCPMC11317471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.