ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Rational design of glycosaminoglycan binding cyclic peptides using cPEPmatch.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for prediction of (Pro)cathepsin-glycosaminoglycan binding free energies based on molecular structure.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- cPEPmatch Webserver: A comprehensive tool and database to aid rational design of cyclic peptides for drug discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclic peptides present a robust platform for drug design, offering high specificity and stability due to their conformationally constrained structures. In this study, we introduce an updated version of the Cyclic Peptide Matching program (cPEPmatch) tailored for the identification of cyclic peptides capable of mimicking protein-glycosaminoglycan (GAG) binding sites. We focused on engineering cyclic peptides to replicate the GAG-binding affinity of antithrombin III (ATIII), a protein that plays a crucial role in modulating anticoagulation through interaction with the GAG heparin. By integrating computational and experimental methods, we successfully identified a cyclic peptide binder with promising potential for future optimization. MD simulations and MM-GBSA calculations were used to assess binding efficacy, supplemented by umbrella sampling to approximate free energy landscapes. The binding specificity was further validated through NMR and ITC experiments. Our findings demonstrate that the computationally designed cyclic peptides effectively target GAGs, suggesting their potential as novel therapeutic agents. This study advances our understanding of peptide-GAG interactions and lays the groundwork for future development of cyclic peptide-based therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.