Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135713›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024

Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

Dereje Zewdu, Temesgen Tantu, Shamil Eanga, Tamiru Tilahun

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07480499 (Comparative Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks in Managing Postoperative Pain for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07480499 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks in Managing Postoperative Pain for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military Hospital MuzaffarabadRan2026 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsPost Operative AnalgesiaArmsErector Spinae Plane Block, Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dereje ZewduDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Temesgen TantuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Shamil EangaDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Tamiru TilahunDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a minimally invasive surgery, it can cause moderate to severe postoperative pain. Erector spinae plane (ESP) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are considered effective means for pain management in such cases; however, there is inconclusive evidence regarding their analgesic efficacy. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of ESP block and TAP block for pain control in LC. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar until 26 January 2024. All randomized clinical trials compared the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) for postoperative pain relief after LC. The primary outcomes were pain scores at rest and on movement at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption, first analgesia request time, and rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We analyzed all the data using RevMan 5.4. Results: A total of 8 RCTs, involving 542 patients (271 in the ESPB group and 271 in the TAPB group), were included in the analysis. The ESP block demonstrated statistically significant lower pain scores at rest and on movement than the TAP block at all-time points except at the 1st and 6th h on movement postoperatively; however, these differences were not considered clinically significant. Additionally, patients who received the ESP block required less morphine and had a longer time before requesting their first dose of analgesia. There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence between the two groups. Conclusion: In patients undergoing LC, there is moderate evidence to suggest that the ESP block is effective in reducing pain severity, morphine equivalent consumption, and the time before the first analgesia request when compared to the TAP block during the early postoperative period.

Indexed as

erector spinae plane blocklaparoscopic cholecystectomynerve block analgesiapostoperative analgesiatransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID39135713
PMCPMC11317285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.