Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135687›Full record

ArticleiMeta2024

JCVI: A versatile toolkit for comparative genomics analysis.

Haibao Tang, Vivek Krishnakumar, Xiaofei Zeng, Zhougeng Xu, Adam Taranto, Johnathan S Lomas, Yixing Zhang, Yumin Huang, Yibin Wang, Won Cheol Yim and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iMeta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 302 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
302citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

302 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assemblies ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pangenome ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

242 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haibao TangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology and College of Life Sciences Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University Fuzhou Fujian China.ORCID 0000-0002-3460-8570
Vivek KrishnakumarJ. Craig Venter Institute Rockville Maryland USA.
Xiaofei ZengNational Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Shenzhen Guangdong China.
Zhougeng XuNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics (NKLPMG), CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences (CEMPS), Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology (SIPPE) Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Shanghai China.
Adam TarantoSchool of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Johnathan S LomasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Nevada Reno Nevada USA.
Yixing ZhangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology and College of Life Sciences Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University Fuzhou Fujian China.
Yumin HuangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology, Haixia Institute of Science and Technology and College of Life Sciences Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University Fuzhou Fujian China.
Yibin WangNational Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Shenzhen Guangdong China.
Won Cheol YimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology University of Nevada Reno Nevada USA.
Jisen ZhangState Key Lab for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Lab for Sugarcane Biology Guangxi University Nanning Guangxi China.
Xingtan ZhangNational Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Shenzhen Guangdong China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The life cycle of genome builds spans interlocking pillars of assembly, annotation, and comparative genomics to drive biological insights. While tools exist to address each pillar separately, there is a growing need for tools to integrate different pillars of a genome project holistically. For example, comparative approaches can provide quality control of assembly or annotation; genome assembly, in turn, can help to identify artifacts that may complicate the interpretation of genome comparisons. The JCVI library is a versatile Python-based library that offers a suite of tools that excel across these pillars. Featuring a modular design, the JCVI library provides high-level utilities for tasks such as format parsing, graphics generation, and manipulation of genome assemblies and annotations. Supporting genomics algorithms like MCscan and ALLMAPS are widely employed in building genome releases, producing publication-ready figures for quality assessment and evolutionary inference. Developed and maintained collaboratively, the JCVI library emphasizes quality and reusability.

Indexed as

comparative genomicsgenome annotationgenome assemblygenomic datavisualization

Identifiers

PMID39135687
PMCPMC11316928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.