Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135678›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2024

Post-introduction evaluation (PIE) of rotavirus vaccine in India.

Pawan Kumar, Arindam Ray, Amrita Kumari, Amanjot Kaur, Rhythm Hora, Kapil Singh, Rashmi Mehra, Seema S Koshal, Shipra Verma, Syed F Quadri and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pawan KumarImmunization Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, India.
Arindam RayBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Delhi, India.
Amrita KumariJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, Delhi, India.
Amanjot KaurJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, Delhi, India.
Rhythm HoraJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, Delhi, India.
Kapil SinghImmunization Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, India.
Rashmi MehraJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, Delhi, India.
Seema S KoshalJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, Delhi, India.
Shipra VermaImmunization Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, India.
Syed F QuadriJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, Delhi, India.
Arup Deb RoyJohn Snow India Pvt Ltd, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: India became the first country in the WHO South-East Asia Region (SEAR) to introduce the rotavirus vaccine (RVV) in the Universal immunization programme (UIP) in 2016 with nationwide expansion by 2019. It was a landmark move to reduce the diarrheal disease burden in under-five children. To assess the implementation process of introduction of RVV, Post Introduction Evaluation (PIE) was conducted in March 2022. Methods: The evaluation was conducted across 14 states, 28 districts and 28 health facilities to obtain a nationwide geographical inclusion. Stakeholders involved in program decision-making, planning, training, vaccine delivery, logistics, and communication from all levels (National, state, district, health facility, health worker, caregiver) were interviewed using standardized data collection tool for PIE (adapted from the standard WHO PIE questionnaire) and scripted on a digital tool. Results: A total of 260 interviews were conducted. Political willingness, well-planned preparedness activities, securing vaccines timely, strong supply chain monitoring, availability of domestic RVV products, quality trainings and intense communication activities were the key factors identified for the successful RVV introduction. Key activities during the introduction included cold chain space assessment, trainings of healthcare workforce, dissemination of job aids, updation of recording & reporting formats and strengthening of AEFI surveillance. Lack of community awareness for immunization in a few areas, fear of AEFI amongst some caregivers and local issues with Alternate Vaccine Delivery (AVD) were some reported challenges in achieving high coverage for RVV. Conclusions: Overall, the nationwide roll-out of RVV was smooth and the vaccine has been well-accepted in the community. The assessment emphasizes on having a well-strategized operational and communication planning, which is very crucial for any new vaccine introduction.

Indexed as

ImmunizationPost introduction evaluationRotavirus vaccine

Identifiers

PMID39135678
PMCPMC11318543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.