Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39135664›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

Telemedical management of symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.

Aenne S von Falkenhausen, Scott Geipel, Antonia Gail, Clemens Scherer, Sven Stockhausen, Lauren E Sams, Finn Becker, Philipp M Doldi, Eric Lemmermöhle, Paul de Villèle and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Aenne S von FalkenhausenDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-3016
Scott GeipelDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Antonia GailDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Clemens SchererDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2816-6793
Sven StockhausenDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lauren E SamsDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Finn BeckerDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Philipp M DoldiDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eric LemmermöhleDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paul de VillèleWithings, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Michael SchleefMVZ Sonnen-Gesundheitszentrum, Munich, Germany.
Marc BeckerLabor Becker, Munich, Germany.
Moritz LauterbachSaniPlus Apotheken, Munich, Germany.
Steffen MassbergDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan KääbDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-3581
Moritz F SinnerDepartment of Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 remains a challenge to individual health and healthcare resources worldwide. Telemedical surveillance might minimise hospitalisation and direct patient-physician contacts. Yet, randomised clinical trials evaluating telemedical management of COVID-19 patients are lacking. Methods: COVID-SMART is a randomised, open-label, controlled clinical trial investigating whether telemedicine reduces the primary end-point of hospitalisation or any unscheduled utilisation of an emergency medical service within 30 days of follow-up. Key secondary end-points included mortality and primary end-point components. We enrolled acutely infected SARS-CoV-2 patients suitable for outpatient care. All presented with ≥1 risk factor for an adverse COVID-19 course. Patients were randomised 1:1 into a control group receiving standard of care and an intervention group receiving smartphone-based assessment of oxygen saturation, heart rate and electrocardiogram, and telemedical counselling Results: Of 607 enrolled patients (mean±sd age 46.7±13.5 years), 304 were randomised into the intervention and 303 into the control group. The primary end-point occurred in 6.9% (n=21) of the intervention and in 9.6% (n=29) of the control group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.26; p=0.24). No deaths occurred during follow-up. Fewer intervention group participants utilised outpatient-based emergency medical services (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.90; p=0.03). Conclusions: COVID-SMART is the first randomised clinical trial assessing the benefit of telemedicine in an acute respiratory infectious disease. Whereas telemedical management did not reduce the primary end-point of hospitalisation, fewer intervention group patients used outpatient-based emergency services, suggesting a potential benefit for less-acutely infected individuals.

Identifiers

PMID39135664
PMCPMC11317893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.